Marco Picco
- Condensed Matter Physics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Jesper Lykke JacobsenRaoul SantachiaraNicolas SourlasLeticia F. CugliandoloFèlix RitortV. Martı́n-MayorPierre PujolNikolaos G. Fytas
- Topics
- Theoretical and Computational Physics (55 papers)Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (27 papers)Complex Network Analysis Techniques (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
Marco Picco
66 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Condensed Matter Physics 825
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 402
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 306
- Mathematical Physics 295
- Materials Chemistry 212
Countries citing papers authored by Marco Picco
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Picco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Picco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Picco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Picco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Picco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Picco. The network helps show where Marco Picco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Picco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Picco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Picco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Picco. Marco Picco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | On the critical exponent a of the 5D random-field Ising model | 3 |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | On the phase transition of the 3D random field Ising model | 9 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Marco Picco
Marco Picco is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Mathematical Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (55 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (27 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (825 citations), Mathematical Physics (295 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (306 citations). Marco Picco has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jesper Lykke Jacobsen, Raoul Santachiara, Nicolas Sourlas, Leticia F. Cugliandolo, Fèlix Ritort, V. Martı́n-Mayor, Pierre Pujol, Nikolaos G. Fytas, A. Honecker and Giorgio Parisi. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.