Thomas Craig

16 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Thomas Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Applied Psychology 50
  • Human-Computer Interaction 54
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 128
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Nathaniel R. Herr with:
Nathaniel R. Herr United States
Gill Toms United Kingdom
Natalie G. Regier United States
Sherrie S. Delinsky United States
K. Van Haitsma United States
Emma Harding United Kingdom
Verena Klusmann Germany
Chelsey R. Wilks United States
Lindsay A. Bornheimer United States
Jennifer Webb-Murphy United States
Thomas Craig relative to Nathaniel R. Herr United States Nathaniel R. Herr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Nathaniel R. Herr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Craig. The network helps show where Thomas Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Craig Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2017196
2 1982106
3 198448
4 199134
5 198330
6 198224
7 201521
8 198413
9 20189
10 19738
11 20058
12 20176
13
Automating the Treatment Planning Process: How? Why? For Whom?
19825
14 20182
15 20212
16 19861
17
ENZYME LINKED IMMUNO TRANSFER BLOT ANALYSI OF EXCRETORY - CECRETORY PROTEINS OF FASIOLOIDES MAGNA & FASCIOLA HEPATICA
19951
18 19811

About Thomas Craig

Thomas Craig is a scholar working on Surgery, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (50 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (54 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (128 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Thomas Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mar Rus‐Calafell, Philippa Garety, Lucia Valmaggia, Matthew J. Edlund, Ann B. Goodman, Carole Siegel, Gary Haugland, Tony Charman, David Cowan and Paul Clifford. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Veterinary Parasitology, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact