Majda Cheour

1.5k citations
92 papers · 725 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Majda Cheour

84 papers receiving 711 citations

Peers

Majda Cheour
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Clinical Psychology 364
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 199
  • Applied Psychology 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
  • Social Psychology 214
Replace Norbert Hartkamp with:
Norbert Hartkamp Germany
Ellen W. Yeung United States
Jessica Kingston United Kingdom
Erik Masthoff Netherlands
Elena Bilevicius Canada
James Doorley United States
Massimiliano Aragona Italy
Emily B. Kroska United States
Fons J. Trompenaars Netherlands
Aarti Jagannathan India
Majda Cheour relative to Norbert Hartkamp Germany Norbert Hartkamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Norbert Hartkamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Majda Cheour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Majda Cheour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Majda Cheour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Majda Cheour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Majda Cheour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Majda Cheour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Majda Cheour. The network helps show where Majda Cheour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Majda Cheour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Majda Cheour Line = papers co-authored together Majda Cheour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202076
2 201967
3 201927
4 202026
5 201924
6 202024
7 202220
8 202119
9 202118
10 202316
11 201916
12 202016
13 202315
14 202115
15 201813
16 202213
17 202013
18 202012
19 202012
20 202312

About Majda Cheour

Majda Cheour is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (25 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (18 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (364 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (199 citations), Applied Psychology (57 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations) and Social Psychology (214 citations). Majda Cheour has collaborated with scholars based in Tunisia, Lebanon and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Feten Fekih‐Romdhane, Souheil Hallit, Haitham Jahrami, Héla Zouari, Sahar Obeïd, Khaled Rahal, Diana Malaeb, Mary V. Seeman, Seithikurippu R. Pandi‐Perumal and Bibi Alamiri. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, L Encéphale, European Psychiatry and International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact