Philippe Conus

13.7k citations
311 papers · 8.6k · h-index 52

Impact in

Papers in

Philippe Conus

286 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Peers

Philippe Conus
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Biological Psychiatry 1.2k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 4.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 376
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Philosophy 527
Replace Ana González‐Pinto with:
Ana González‐Pinto Spain
P.F. Buckley United States
Stanley Zammit United Kingdom
Bart P. F. Rutten Netherlands
Michael Riedel Germany
Lauren B. Marangell United States
David Copolov Australia
Gerhard Hellemann United States
Robin Emsley South Africa
Miquel Bernardo Spain
Philippe Conus relative to Ana González‐Pinto Spain Ana González‐Pinto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ana González‐Pinto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Conus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Conus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Conus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Conus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Conus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Conus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Conus. The network helps show where Philippe Conus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Conus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philippe Conus Line = papers co-authored together Philippe Conus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 311 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008446
2 2007306
3 2005266
4 2007259
5 2004208
6 2010194
7 2020177
8 2007177
9 2014173
10 2011153
11 2009153
12 2007144
13 2017137
14 2014134
15 2013127
16 2008121
17 2005116
18 2009111
19 2010111
20 2010106

About Philippe Conus

Philippe Conus is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Biological Psychiatry and General Health Professions, having authored 311 papers that have together received 8.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (118 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (50 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (30 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (28 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (15 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (15 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (15 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (1.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (376 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations) and Philosophy (527 citations). Philippe Conus has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Patrick D. McGorry, Sue Cotton, Martin Lambert, Benno G. Schimmelmann, Michael Berk, Kim Q., Michel Cuénod, Philipp Baumann, Charles Bonsack and Craig Macneil. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, European Psychiatry and Molecular Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact