Mae Squires
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Nursing education and management
- Leadership and Management top 5%
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 3
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
-
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors 4
- Co-authors
- Ann E. Tourangeau (6 shared papers)Lisa Cranley (3 shared papers)Diane Doran (4 shared papers)Kimberley Widger (3 shared papers)Heather K. Spence Laschinger (1 shared paper)Barbara L. Wilson (1 shared paper)Margaret Saari (1 shared paper)Heather Thomson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Nursing Management (3 papers)Journal of Forensic Nursing (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (1 paper)Implementation Science (1 paper)Disability and Rehabilitation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mae Squires
12 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Research and Theory 130
- Leadership and Management 25
- Emergency Medical Services 107
- Life-span and Life-course Studies 10
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Mae Squires
This map shows the geographic impact of Mae Squires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mae Squires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mae Squires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mae Squires
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mae Squires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mae Squires. The network helps show where Mae Squires may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mae Squires, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 149 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | The missing data dilemma. | 2009 | 1 |
About Mae Squires
Mae Squires is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Research and Theory, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (130 citations), Leadership and Management (25 citations), Emergency Medical Services (107 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (10 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations). Mae Squires has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ann E. Tourangeau, Lisa Cranley, Diane Doran, Kimberley Widger, Heather K. Spence Laschinger, Barbara L. Wilson, Margaret Saari, Heather Thomson, Andrew G. Day and Roy Ilan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, Journal of Forensic Nursing, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, Implementation Science and Disability and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.