M. Sentis
Impact in
- Computational Mechanics top 1%
- Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Ion-surface interactions and analysis
- Mechanics of Materials top 1%
- Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Papers in
-
- Laser Material Processing Techniques 26
-
- Ocular and Laser Science Research 12
- Co-authors
- Tatiana ItinaW. MarineJörg HermannPhilippe DelaporteAndrei V. KabashinK. V. KhishchenkoMikhail E. PovarnitsynP. R. Levashov
In The Last Decade
M. Sentis
57 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Computational Mechanics 779
- Mechanics of Materials 871
- Biomedical Engineering 831
- Ophthalmology 153
- Materials Chemistry 655
Countries citing papers authored by M. Sentis
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Sentis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Sentis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Sentis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Sentis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Sentis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Sentis. The network helps show where M. Sentis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Sentis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 135 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 108 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 10 | Interaction of femtosecond laser pulses with dielectric materials: insights from numerical modelling | 2010 | 4 |
| 11 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 118 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 179 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 65 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 34 |
About M. Sentis
M. Sentis is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Ophthalmology, Mechanics of Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (30 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (26 papers), Laser Design and Applications (13 papers), Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles (12 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (12 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (7 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (779 citations), Mechanics of Materials (871 citations), Biomedical Engineering (831 citations), Ophthalmology (153 citations) and Materials Chemistry (655 citations). M. Sentis has collaborated with scholars based in France, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tatiana Itina, W. Marine, Jörg Hermann, Philippe Delaporte, Andrei V. Kabashin, K. V. Khishchenko, Mikhail E. Povarnitsyn, P. R. Levashov, O. Utéza and V. I. Safarov. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Surface Science, Scientific Reports, Thin Solid Films, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics and Physical Review B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.