J.-P. Chambaret

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

J.-P. Chambaret is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, J.-P. Chambaret has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 18 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in J.-P. Chambaret's work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (24 papers), Laser Design and Applications (12 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers). J.-P. Chambaret is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (24 papers), Laser Design and Applications (12 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers). J.-P. Chambaret collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. J.-P. Chambaret's co-authors include G. Grillon, A. Antonetti, A. Rousse, M. Pittman, G. Hamoniaux, F. Burgy, S. P. D. Mangles, K. Krushelnick, E. Lefebvre and J. N. Scheurer and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review A and Optics Letters.

In The Last Decade

J.-P. Chambaret

33 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Electron Acceleration by a Wake Field Forced by an Intense Ultrashort Laser Pulse

2002 467 citations F. Burgy, J.-P. Chambaret et al. profile →

Peers

J.-P. Chambaret

AMPO

NHEP

MM

EEE

CM

M. Pittman France

David Salzmann Israel

Mikhail Kalashnikov Germany

R.W. Lee United States

B. H. Failor United States

P. Maine United States

F. Ehlotzky Austria

H. D. Wahl Germany

R. Nuter France

O. Gobert France

M. Pittman France

J.-P. Chambaret

1.1k ×1.2

AMPO

1.0k ×1.5

NHEP

543 ×1.4

MM

286 ×1.1

EEE

93 ×0.7

CM

Citations per year, relative to J.-P. Chambaret J.-P. Chambaret (= 1×) peers M. Pittman

Countries citing papers authored by J.-P. Chambaret

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.-P. Chambaret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.-P. Chambaret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.-P. Chambaret more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.-P. Chambaret

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.-P. Chambaret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.-P. Chambaret. The network helps show where J.-P. Chambaret may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.-P. Chambaret

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.-P. Chambaret. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.-P. Chambaret based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.-P. Chambaret. J.-P. Chambaret is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Utéza, O., N. Sanner, M. Sentis, et al.. (2009). Laser induced damage of sapphire and titanium doped sapphire crystals under femtosecond to nanosecond laser irradiation. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7504. 75041N–75041N. 2 indexed citations

2.

Flacco, A., L. Canova, R. Clady, et al.. (2007). Efficient aberrations pre-compensation and wavefront correction with a deformable mirror in the middle of a petawatt-class CPA laser system. Laser and Particle Beams. 25(4). 649–655. 6 indexed citations

3.

Chambaret, J.-P., et al.. (2007). Pump Beams Homogenization for Terawatt / Petawatt Class Ti:Sapphire Amplifiers. 2007 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO). 1–2. 2 indexed citations

4.

Utéza, O., et al.. (2007). Laser-induced damage threshold of sapphire in nanosecond, picosecond and femtosecond regimes. Applied Surface Science. 254(4). 799–803. 65 indexed citations

5.

Planchon, T., F. Burgy, J. Rousseau, & J.-P. Chambaret. (2005). 3D Modeling of amplification processes in CPA laser amplifiers. Applied Physics B. 80(6). 661–667. 9 indexed citations

6.

Pittman, M., et al.. (2005). Suppression of parasitic lasing in large-aperture Ti:sapphire amplifiers. Amplifying strategies for high rep-rate petawatt class Ti:sapphire systems. 3. 1848–1849.

7.

Chambaret, J.-P.. (2004). High intensity femtosecond laser technology. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1. 1055–1055. 1 indexed citations

8.

Chériaux, G., J.-P. Chambaret, & T. Planchon. (2004). Adaptive optics in ultra-intense laser chains: the mid-field issue. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1. 1063–1064. 2 indexed citations

9.

Pittman, M., et al.. (2001). Near diffraction limited 100 TW-10 Hz femtosecond laser. New approaches towards ultra-high intensities. 72–73. 1 indexed citations

10.

Geindre, J. P., et al.. (2001). Single-shot spectral interferometry of femtosecond laser-produced plasmas. Laser and Particle Beams. 19(1). 67–73. 18 indexed citations

11.

Planchon, T., et al.. (2001). Nonlinear Sagnac interferometer for temporal pulse cleaning of high peak power femtosecond laser. 45–46. 2 indexed citations

12.

Zavelani–Rossi, M., et al.. (2000). Control of thermal effects for high-intensity Ti:sapphire laser chains. Applied Physics B. 70(S1). S193–S196. 17 indexed citations

13.

Ranc, S., et al.. (2000). Importance of spatial quality of intense femtosecond pulses. Applied Physics B. 70(S1). S181–S187. 20 indexed citations

14.

Dorrer, C., B. de Beauvoir, S. Ranc, et al.. (1999). Single-shot real-time characterization of chirped-pulse amplification systems by spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction. Optics Letters. 24(22). 1644–1644. 59 indexed citations

15.

Chambaret, J.-P., G. Chériaux, P. F. Curley, et al.. (1996). Generation of 25-TW, 32-fs pulses at 10 Hz. Optics Letters. 21(23). 1921–1921. 61 indexed citations

16.

Curley, P. F., G. Chériaux, Philippe Rousseau, et al.. (1996). Multi-pass amplification of sub-50 fs pulses up to the 4 TW level. Optics Communications. 131(1-3). 72–76. 3 indexed citations

17.

Agostini, P., E. Mével, P. Breger, et al.. (1993). Evolution from perturbative to field-ionization regimes through electron spectroscopy. AIP conference proceedings. 290. 231–236. 1 indexed citations

18.

Walker, Barry C., E. Mével, Baorui Yang, et al.. (1993). Double ionization in the perturbative and tunneling regimes. Physical Review A. 48(2). R894–R897. 109 indexed citations

19.

Chambaret, J.-P., et al.. (1989). Generation of megawatt tunable pulses of duration 90 fs at a 11 kHz repetition rate: First experiments in the range 800–850 nm. Optics Communications. 69(5-6). 401–404. 17 indexed citations

20.

André, Yves, J.-P. Chambaret, M. Franco, & B. Prade. (1979). Infrared video camera at 10 μm. Applied Optics. 18(15). 2607–2607. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact