M. Pamilo

866 total citations
40 papers, 688 citations indexed

About

M. Pamilo is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Pamilo has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 688 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 14 papers in Oncology and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in M. Pamilo's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), AI in cancer detection (9 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (8 papers). M. Pamilo is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), AI in cancer detection (9 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (8 papers). M. Pamilo collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Germany and Uganda. M. Pamilo's co-authors include M. Soiva, I. Suramo, Marjut Leidenius, K.A.J. von Smitten, M. Taavitsainen, M. Pãivänsalo, Jouko Lönnqvist, Arja R. Aro, Tuomas Eerola and L. Kivisaari and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

In The Last Decade

M. Pamilo

40 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Pamilo Finland	13	295	223	220	219	175	40	688
Eva Rubin United States	14	194 0.7×	364 1.6×	268 1.2×	115 0.5×	141 0.8×	34	695
S H Ominsky United States	11	470 1.6×	142 0.6×	121 0.6×	134 0.6×	237 1.4×	23	776
Kathryn Evers United States	16	270 0.9×	219 1.0×	253 1.1×	161 0.7×	166 0.9×	30	738
Olga M. B. Gatewood United States	15	121 0.4×	394 1.8×	285 1.3×	240 1.1×	184 1.1×	32	785
M. Soiva Finland	12	166 0.6×	166 0.7×	143 0.7×	217 1.0×	129 0.7×	25	511
Abid Irshad United States	16	162 0.5×	270 1.2×	211 1.0×	107 0.5×	181 1.0×	36	680
Dana Smetherman United States	13	144 0.5×	307 1.4×	267 1.2×	148 0.7×	92 0.5×	27	649
G C Hansen United States	11	69 0.2×	238 1.1×	143 0.7×	218 1.0×	114 0.7×	17	683
Leslie R. Lamb United States	18	228 0.8×	246 1.1×	218 1.0×	224 1.0×	337 1.9×	46	1.1k
Cihan Uras Türkiye	14	197 0.7×	148 0.7×	116 0.5×	273 1.2×	112 0.6×	65	514

Countries citing papers authored by M. Pamilo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Pamilo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Pamilo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Pamilo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Pamilo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Pamilo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Pamilo. The network helps show where M. Pamilo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Pamilo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Pamilo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Pamilo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Pamilo. M. Pamilo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Anttila, Ahti, et al.. (2010). Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program. Acta Radiologica. 51(5). 491–497. 12 indexed citations

Pfleiderer, Stefan O.R., R. Schulz-Wendtland, M. Pamilo, et al.. (2009). Two-year follow-up of stereotactically guided 9-G breast biopsy: a multicenter evaluation of a self-contained vacuum-assisted device. Clinical Imaging. 33(5). 343–347. 9 indexed citations

Leikola, Junnu, Päivi Heikkilä, M. Pamilo, et al.. (2007). Predicting invasion in patients with DCIS in the preoperative percutaneous biopsy. Acta Oncologica. 46(6). 798–802. 13 indexed citations

Pamilo, M., et al.. (2007). Breast positioning system for full field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis system. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6510. 651036–651036. 1 indexed citations

Pamilo, M., et al.. (2005). Clinical benefits of combined diagnostic three-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound imaging. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5745. 562–562. 2 indexed citations

Pamilo, M., et al.. (2004). Breast lymphedema after breast conserving treatment. Acta Oncologica. 43(6). 551–557. 72 indexed citations

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1998). Graft patency evaluation with colour-doppler ultrasonography after bypass surgery in Takayasu's arteritis: a direct colour-flow lumen imaging method. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 16(6). 525–529. 4 indexed citations

Rissanen, Tuuli, M. Pamilo, & I. Suramo. (1998). Ultrasonography as a guidance method in the evaluation of mammographically detected nonpalpable breast lesions of suspected malignancy. Acta Radiologica. 39(3). 292–297. 11 indexed citations

Aro, Arja R., et al.. (1996). Pain and discomfort during mammography. European Journal of Cancer. 32(10). 1674–1679. 56 indexed citations

10.

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1993). Double reading of mammography screening films-one radiologist or two?. Clinical Radiology. 48(6). 414–421. 98 indexed citations

11.

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1991). Ultrasonography of Breast Lesions Detected in Mammography Screening. Acta Radiologica. 32(3). 220–225. 32 indexed citations

12.

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1990). Mammography screening — reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the finnish system. Clinical Radiology. 41(6). 384–387. 18 indexed citations

13.

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1989). Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer: First Year Results from Helsinki and Surroundings. Annals of Medicine. 21(4). 277–279. 6 indexed citations

14.

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1989). Real-time ultrasound, axillary mammography, and clinical examination in the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 8(3). 115–120. 131 indexed citations

15.

Soiva, M., M. Pamilo, M. Pãivänsalo, M. Taavitsainen, & I. Suramo. (1988). Ultrasonography in Acute Gallbladder Perforation. Acta Radiologica. 29(1). 41–44. 5 indexed citations

16.

Soiva, M., M. Pamilo, M. Pãivänsalo, M. Taavitsainen, & I. Suramo. (1988). Ultrasonography in acute gallbladder perforation. Acta Radiologica. 29(1). 41–44. 15 indexed citations

17.

Suramo, I. & M. Pamilo. (1986). Ultrasound Examination of Foreign Bodies. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis. 27(4). 463–466. 20 indexed citations

18.

Pamilo, M., et al.. (1984). [Renal parenchymal malacoplakia].. PubMed. 100(3). 151–7. 1 indexed citations

19.

Pãivänsalo, M., et al.. (1983). Real-time ultrasonography as the primary imaging method in suspect renal pathology of adults.. PubMed. 52(4). 202–7. 1 indexed citations

20.

Suramo, I., S Lähde, M. Pamilo, et al.. (1982). Ultrasound and Computed Tomography of Small Asymptomatic Haemangiomas of the Liver. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis. 23(6). 577–583. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact