Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans
1993551 citationsH Tiitinen, Janne Sinkkonen et al.Natureprofile →
Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory
1994528 citationsH Tiitinen, Patrick May et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of H Tiitinen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H Tiitinen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H Tiitinen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H Tiitinen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H Tiitinen. The network helps show where H Tiitinen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H Tiitinen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H Tiitinen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H Tiitinen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H Tiitinen. H Tiitinen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
May, Patrick & H Tiitinen. (2004). Auditory scene analysis and sensory memory: the role of the auditory N100m.. PubMed. 2004. 19–19.11 indexed citations
5.
Mäkinen, Ville, Patrick May, & H Tiitinen. (2004). Spectral characterization of ongoing and auditory event-related brain processes.. PubMed. 2004. 104–104.4 indexed citations
Tiitinen, H, Patrick May, K. Reinikainen, & Risto Näätänen. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature. 372(6501). 90–92.528 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Tiitinen, H, Janne Sinkkonen, K. Reinikainen, et al.. (1993). Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans. Nature. 364(6432). 59–60.551 indexed citations breakdown →
Tiitinen, H. (1969). Isoniazid and ethionamide serum levels and inactivation in Finnish subjects.. PubMed. 50(2). 110–24.32 indexed citations
16.
Tiitinen, H, et al.. (1969). Serum levels, urinary excretion, and side-effects of cycloserine in the presence of isoniazid and p-aminosalicylic acid.. PubMed. 50(4). 291–300.3 indexed citations
17.
Tiitinen, H. (1969). Isoniazid inactivation status and the development of chronic tuberculosis.. PubMed. 50(3). 227–34.3 indexed citations
18.
Tiitinen, H, et al.. (1968). Comparison of the isoniazid inactivation in Finns and Lapps.. PubMed. 57(4). 161–6.10 indexed citations
19.
Muittari, A, et al.. (1967). The effect of orciprenaline and its p-hydroxyphenyl derivative on the peak expiratory flow rate in asthmatic patients.. PubMed. 17(3). 362–4.11 indexed citations
20.
Tiitinen, H, et al.. (1967). The rate of isoniazid inactivation in Finnish diabetic and non-diabetic patients.. PubMed. 45(4). 423–7.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.