Ingo B. Runnebaum

11.8k citations
183 papers · 4.9k indexed · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Ingo B. Runnebaum

175 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Ingo B. Runnebaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.1k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 885
  • Cancer Research 972
  • Oncology 1.7k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 483
Replace Stefania Bellone with:
Stefania Bellone United States
Federica Tomao Italy
Setsuko K. Chambers United States
Margaret M. Steinhoff United States
Sven� Mahner Germany
Noriomi Matsumura Japan
Hal W. Hirte Canada
Junzo Hamanishi Japan
Hidetaka Katabuchi Japan
Heidi J. Gray United States
Ingo B. Runnebaum relative to Stefania Bellone United States Stefania Bellone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stefania Bellone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo B. Runnebaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo B. Runnebaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo B. Runnebaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo B. Runnebaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo B. Runnebaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo B. Runnebaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo B. Runnebaum. The network helps show where Ingo B. Runnebaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingo B. Runnebaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo B. Runnebaum Line = papers co-authored together Ingo B. Runnebaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20232
3 20236
4 20231
5 20230
6 20232
7 20231
8 20229
9 202219
10 20226
11 202111
12 20216
13 20196
14 20189
15 201735
16 201731
17 20161
18 2015167
19 201413
20 2010126

About Ingo B. Runnebaum

Ingo B. Runnebaum is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Cancer Research and Biotechnology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (41 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (22 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (22 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (22 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (19 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (17 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.1k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (885 citations), Cancer Research (972 citations), Oncology (1.7k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (483 citations). Ingo B. Runnebaum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mieczysław Gajda, R. Kreienberg, Matthias Dürst, Elmar Stickeler, Ansgar Brüning, Oumar Camara, Lars Jansen, Anke Mothes, Norman Häfner and Pascal Baltzer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Journal of Clinical Oncology and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026