Peter B. Dean

4.3k total citations
124 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Peter B. Dean is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter B. Dean has authored 124 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Oncology, 32 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 24 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Peter B. Dean's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (29 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (21 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (16 papers). Peter B. Dean is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (29 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (21 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (16 papers). Peter B. Dean collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and United States. Peter B. Dean's co-authors include Làszló Tabár, Martti Kormano, Tibor Tot, Chien‐Jen Chen, Stephen W. Duffy, L. Kivisaari, Zoltán Péntek, L. Tabár, Robert A. Smith and Amy Ming‐Fang Yen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Peter B. Dean

115 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Peter B. Dean 766 628 545 535 508 124 2.3k
Barbara Monsees 1.2k 1.6× 958 1.5× 787 1.4× 872 1.6× 568 1.1× 76 3.0k
Paul C. Stomper 860 1.1× 918 1.5× 1.2k 2.2× 1.3k 2.4× 589 1.2× 78 2.9k
Mary C. Mahoney 455 0.6× 885 1.4× 415 0.8× 774 1.4× 510 1.0× 91 2.0k
Bonnie N. Joe 483 0.6× 1.9k 3.0× 639 1.2× 508 0.9× 804 1.6× 170 3.4k
Başak E. Doğan 609 0.8× 1.3k 2.1× 1.2k 2.1× 1.1k 2.0× 336 0.7× 115 2.8k
Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk 1.6k 2.1× 293 0.5× 468 0.9× 230 0.4× 1.1k 2.3× 110 3.1k
Isabelle Trop 438 0.6× 701 1.1× 863 1.6× 1.0k 1.9× 290 0.6× 82 2.6k
Enrico Cassano 499 0.7× 1.0k 1.7× 820 1.5× 727 1.4× 463 0.9× 149 2.5k
Kennedy W. Gilchrist 1.7k 2.3× 660 1.1× 1.5k 2.7× 688 1.3× 567 1.1× 84 4.1k
T. Landberg 873 1.1× 429 0.7× 289 0.5× 399 0.7× 605 1.2× 104 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter B. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter B. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter B. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter B. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter B. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter B. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter B. Dean. The network helps show where Peter B. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter B. Dean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter B. Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter B. Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter B. Dean. Peter B. Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Duffy, Stephen W., Làszló Tabár, Chien‐Jen Chen, et al.. (2023). A plea for more careful scholarship in reviewing evidence: the case of mammographic screening. BJR|Open. 5(1). 20230041–20230041.
2.
Smith, Robert A., Stephen W. Duffy, Amy Ming‐Fang Yen, et al.. (2023). Beneficial effect of repeated participation in breast cancer screening upon survival.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(16_suppl). 552–552. 1 indexed citations
3.
Tabár, Làszló, Peter B. Dean, F. Lee Tucker, et al.. (2023). The challenging imaging and histopathologic features of diffusely infiltrating breast cancer. European Journal of Radiology. 161. 110754–110754. 6 indexed citations
4.
Tabár, Làszló, Peter B. Dean, F. Lee Tucker, et al.. (2022). Breast cancers originating from the major lactiferous ducts and the process of neoductgenesis: Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Breast, DAB. European Journal of Radiology. 153. 110363–110363. 6 indexed citations
5.
Tabár, Làszló, Peter B. Dean, F. Lee Tucker, et al.. (2022). Breast cancers originating from the terminal ductal lobular units: In situ and invasive acinar adenocarcinoma of the breast, AAB. European Journal of Radiology. 152. 110323–110323. 14 indexed citations
6.
Duffy, Stephen W., Làszló Tabár, Amy Ming‐Fang Yen, et al.. (2021). Beneficial Effect of Consecutive Screening Mammography Examinations on Mortality from Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study. Radiology. 299(3). 541–547. 83 indexed citations
7.
Jarm, Katja, Maksimiljan Kadivec, Maja Primic Žakelj, et al.. (2021). Quality assured implementation of the Slovenian breast cancer screening programme. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0258343–e0258343. 5 indexed citations
8.
Tabár, Làszló & Peter B. Dean. (2010). A New Era in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. The Breast Journal. 16. S2–S4. 19 indexed citations
9.
Dean, Peter B.. (2004). Gøtzsche’s quixotic antiscreening campaign: nonscientific and contrary to Cochrane principles. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 1(1). 3–7. 5 indexed citations
10.
Tabár, Làszló & Peter B. Dean. (2003). Mammography and breast cancer: the new era. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 82(3). 319–326. 51 indexed citations
11.
Burhenne, Linda J. Warren, et al.. (2001). Mammographic screening: International perspective. Seminars in Roentgenology. 36(3). 187–194. 6 indexed citations
12.
Dean, Peter B.. (2000). The Swedish mammography screening trials. Check up on your sources.. PubMed. 97(25). 3105–6. 1 indexed citations
13.
Tsushima, Yoshito, et al.. (1996). Dynamic Gd-DTPA-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Kidney: Comparison between T1 – and T2*-Weighted Sequences. American Journal of Nephrology. 16(6). 506–512. 7 indexed citations
14.
Tsushima, Yoshito, et al.. (1996). Traumatic fistula between the left anterior descending coronary artery and a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 19(4). 272–274. 3 indexed citations
15.
Mattila, Kimmo, et al.. (1995). Massive osteoarticular knee allografts: structural changes evaluated with CT.. Radiology. 196(3). 657–660. 4 indexed citations
16.
Kalimo, Hannu, Marja‐Liisa Savontaus, H. Lang, et al.. (1988). X‐Linked myopathy with excessive autophagy: A new hereditary muscle disease. Annals of Neurology. 23(3). 258–265. 88 indexed citations
17.
Paajanen, Hannu, Robert C. Brasch, & Peter B. Dean. (1988). Experimental acute pancreatitis: MR relaxation time studies using gadolinium–DTPA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 6(1). 63–73. 5 indexed citations
18.
Tabár, Làszló & Peter B. Dean. (1987). The Control of Breast Cancer Through Mammography Screening. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 25(5). 993–1005. 50 indexed citations
19.
Dean, Peter B., et al.. (1987). Breast Lesions Examined by Digital Angiography. Investigative Radiology. 22(8). 698–699. 10 indexed citations
20.
Lipton, Martin J., Peter B. Dean, D. W. Farmer, Hans Ringertz, & C B Higgins. (1984). Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow by cine computed tomography. 107. 169. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026