M. Morley

414 total citations
9 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

M. Morley is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Morley has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in M. Morley's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers). M. Morley is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers). M. Morley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Spain. M. Morley's co-authors include John Kincey, Anne L. Carrington, A. J. M. Boulton, G.A. Blok, Jan van Dalen, Bernard Cohen, Kitty J. Jager, Celia Wight, C. Reid and Cees van der Vleuten and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice and Advances in Health Sciences Education.

In The Last Decade

M. Morley

9 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Morley United Kingdom 7 165 132 114 73 59 9 337
Lynne Broderick United States 8 67 0.4× 78 0.6× 40 0.4× 91 1.2× 123 2.1× 21 432
Soraia Assad Nasbine Rabeh Brazil 11 48 0.3× 28 0.2× 71 0.6× 51 0.7× 60 1.0× 35 289
I Girod France 8 31 0.2× 148 1.1× 20 0.2× 115 1.6× 91 1.5× 15 323
Yi‐Ping Song China 9 32 0.2× 73 0.6× 37 0.3× 87 1.2× 150 2.5× 14 276
Debra Hanson United States 10 41 0.2× 80 0.6× 19 0.2× 110 1.5× 208 3.5× 23 329
Farah Siddiqui United Kingdom 9 97 0.6× 32 0.2× 25 0.2× 14 0.2× 13 0.2× 32 317
Yanming Ding China 8 35 0.2× 58 0.4× 12 0.1× 22 0.3× 53 0.9× 24 176
F. Derry United Kingdom 10 33 0.2× 78 0.6× 71 0.6× 20 0.3× 12 0.2× 22 382
Fardis Vosoughi Iran 10 72 0.4× 13 0.1× 58 0.5× 27 0.4× 15 0.3× 40 298
Ellie Lindsay United Kingdom 10 56 0.3× 45 0.3× 8 0.1× 151 2.1× 163 2.8× 32 367

Countries citing papers authored by M. Morley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Morley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Morley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Morley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Morley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Morley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Morley. The network helps show where M. Morley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Morley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Morley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Morley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Morley. M. Morley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2005). Requesting organ donation: The case of self-efficacy. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 9(4). 261–282. 8 indexed citations
2.
Burroughs, Heather, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, David Richards, et al.. (2004). "We rob off the in-patient unit": a qualitative study of the recruitment of CPNs by Mental Health Trusts. 9(2). 63–66. 1 indexed citations
3.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2004). Requesting Organ Donation: The Case of Self-Efficacy ? Effects of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP). Advances in Health Sciences Education. 9(4). 261–282. 28 indexed citations
4.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2000). The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): Enhancing Communication Skills with Bereaved Relatives. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 28(2). 184–190. 33 indexed citations
5.
Blok, G.A., Jan van Dalen, Kitty J. Jager, et al.. (1999). The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transplant International. 12(3). 161–167. 46 indexed citations
6.
Dalen, Jan van, G.A. Blok, M. Morley, et al.. (1999). Participants' judgements of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): an international comparison. Transplant International. 12(3). 182–187. 15 indexed citations
7.
Blok, G.A., Jan van Dalen, Kitty J. Jager, et al.. (1999). The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transplant International. 12(3). 161–167. 46 indexed citations
8.
Carrington, Anne L., et al.. (1996). Psychological status of diabetic people with or without lower limb disability. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 32(1-2). 19–25. 154 indexed citations
9.
Simpson, Steve, et al.. (1996). CRIME-RELATED POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IN ELDERLY PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS: A CASE SERIES. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 11(10). 879–882. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026