G.A. Blok

462 total citations
19 papers, 328 citations indexed

About

G.A. Blok is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, G.A. Blok has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 328 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 9 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in G.A. Blok's work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (9 papers). G.A. Blok is often cited by papers focused on Organ Donation and Transplantation (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (9 papers). G.A. Blok collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Spain. G.A. Blok's co-authors include M. Morley, Jan van Dalen, Dason Evans, Kitty J. Jager, Celia Wight, Bernard Cohen, Cees van der Vleuten, C. Reid, G. Kootstra and Jouke van der Zee and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Patient Education and Counseling and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

G.A. Blok

19 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G.A. Blok Netherlands 9 264 149 51 48 33 19 328
Hannah Maple United Kingdom 10 238 0.9× 111 0.7× 69 1.4× 27 0.6× 5 0.2× 25 332
Jeffrey P. Spike United States 8 232 0.9× 75 0.5× 11 0.2× 139 2.9× 24 0.7× 49 338
Neide da Silva Knihs Brazil 9 145 0.5× 54 0.4× 15 0.3× 37 0.8× 4 0.1× 67 237
Neide Aparecida Micelli Domingos Brazil 10 110 0.4× 132 0.9× 118 2.3× 72 1.5× 1 0.0× 35 384
Shayna S. Coburn United States 12 97 0.4× 84 0.6× 53 1.0× 29 0.6× 10 0.3× 24 300
Henry Pohl United States 9 261 1.0× 21 0.1× 13 0.3× 88 1.8× 98 3.0× 13 330
Jan C. Wouda Netherlands 9 122 0.5× 38 0.3× 12 0.2× 105 2.2× 47 1.4× 16 295
Sofie Vandenbroeck Belgium 9 75 0.3× 55 0.4× 9 0.2× 165 3.4× 31 0.9× 32 392
Wendy Dean United States 9 125 0.5× 88 0.6× 64 1.3× 117 2.4× 2 0.1× 22 304
Jordan Gilleland United States 10 32 0.1× 53 0.4× 46 0.9× 27 0.6× 8 0.2× 12 324

Countries citing papers authored by G.A. Blok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.A. Blok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.A. Blok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.A. Blok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.A. Blok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.A. Blok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.A. Blok. The network helps show where G.A. Blok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.A. Blok

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.A. Blok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.A. Blok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.A. Blok. G.A. Blok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Eijkelenboom, AnneMarie, G.A. Blok, & Philomena M. Bluyssen. (2019). Comfort and satisfaction of patients, visitors and staff with patient rooms at inpatient wards, a pilot study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 111. 2036–2036. 6 indexed citations
2.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2018). Imagining Communities : Historical Reflections on the Process of Community Formation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 5. 2 indexed citations
3.
Evans, Dason, et al.. (2012). What is a clinical skill? Searching for order in chaos through a modified Delphi process. Medical Teacher. 34(8). e573–e581. 67 indexed citations
4.
Friele, R.D., et al.. (2008). The impact of donor policies in Europe: a steady increase, but not everywhere. BMC Health Services Research. 8(1). 235–235. 25 indexed citations
5.
Blok, G.A.. (2006). Dealing with Grief and Requesting Donation an International Challenge. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
6.
Muthny, F. A., Silvia Wiedebusch, G.A. Blok, & Jan van Dalen. (2006). Training for Doctors and Nurses to Deal With Bereaved Relatives After a Sudden Death: Evaluation of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP) in Germany. Transplantation Proceedings. 38(9). 2751–2755. 11 indexed citations
7.
Blok, G.A.. (2006). Approaching donor families: culture, religion & ethnicity. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. 11(2). 123–129. 6 indexed citations
8.
Tempelaar, Dirk, et al.. (2006). An online summer course for prospective international students to remediate deficiencies in Math prior knowledge: the case of ALEKS. 6 indexed citations
9.
Rienties, Bart, et al.. (2005). Online bijspijkeronderwijs in de praktijk. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 23(4). 239–253. 2 indexed citations
10.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2005). Requesting organ donation: The case of self-efficacy. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 9(4). 261–282. 8 indexed citations
11.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2004). Requesting Organ Donation: The Case of Self-Efficacy ? Effects of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP). Advances in Health Sciences Education. 9(4). 261–282. 28 indexed citations
12.
Blok, G.A.. (2004). The impact of changes in practice in organ procurement on the satisfaction of donor relatives. Patient Education and Counseling. 58(1). 104–113. 11 indexed citations
13.
Blok, G.A., et al.. (2000). The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): Enhancing Communication Skills with Bereaved Relatives. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 28(2). 184–190. 33 indexed citations
14.
Blok, G.A., Jan van Dalen, Kitty J. Jager, et al.. (1999). The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transplant International. 12(3). 161–167. 46 indexed citations
15.
Dalen, Jan van, G.A. Blok, M. Morley, et al.. (1999). Participants' judgements of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): an international comparison. Transplant International. 12(3). 182–187. 15 indexed citations
16.
Blok, G.A., Jan van Dalen, Kitty J. Jager, et al.. (1999). The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transplant International. 12(3). 161–167. 46 indexed citations
17.
Dalen, Jan van, et al.. (1999). Participants' judgements of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): an international comparison. Transplant International. 12(3). 182–187. 2 indexed citations
18.
Wight, Celia, Kitty J. Jager, G.A. Blok, Jan van Dalen, & B. Cohen. (1996). Overview of the European Donor Hospital Education Program.. PubMed. 28(1). 422–3. 8 indexed citations
19.
Bögels, Susan M., et al.. (1995). Assessment and validation of diagnostic interviewing skills for the mental health professions. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 17(3). 217–230. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026