M. Mark Miller

740 total citations
22 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

M. Mark Miller is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Mark Miller has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Communication, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in M. Mark Miller's work include Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (4 papers). M. Mark Miller is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (4 papers). M. Mark Miller collaborates with scholars based in United States. M. Mark Miller's co-authors include Byron Reeves, Stephen D. Reese, Julie L. Andsager, Catherine A. Luther, Albert R. Tims, Shu‐Ling Chen, Michael W. Singletary, Bryan E. Denham, Charles K. Atkin and Ronald J. Faber and has published in prestigious journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, Communication Research and International Journal of Intercultural Relations.

In The Last Decade

M. Mark Miller

21 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Mark Miller United States	11	277	212	130	125	56	22	515
Rebecca Ann Lind United States	10	198 0.7×	121 0.6×	110 0.8×	48 0.4×	23 0.4×	25	398
Joan Schleuder United States	7	310 1.1×	295 1.4×	31 0.2×	168 1.3×	77 1.4×	8	560
Clyde Thogmartin United States	3	229 0.8×	147 0.7×	60 0.5×	305 2.4×	26 0.5×	12	679
Jon Dovey United Kingdom	7	151 0.5×	182 0.9×	89 0.7×	50 0.4×	24 0.4×	14	424
Espen Ytreberg Norway	13	254 0.9×	195 0.9×	56 0.4×	70 0.6×	31 0.6×	34	473
Paul S. Voakes United States	10	350 1.3×	191 0.9×	55 0.4×	26 0.2×	26 0.5×	17	475
Paul Hendriks Vettehen Netherlands	11	192 0.7×	170 0.8×	43 0.3×	128 1.0×	16 0.3×	22	386
Kevin Howley United States	9	229 0.8×	157 0.7×	69 0.5×	65 0.5×	33 0.6×	26	448
Jacob J. Wakshlag United States	11	220 0.8×	273 1.3×	108 0.8×	233 1.9×	12 0.2×	19	570
Elizabeth A. Skewes United States	6	621 2.2×	268 1.3×	64 0.5×	37 0.3×	45 0.8×	13	732

Countries citing papers authored by M. Mark Miller

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Mark Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Mark Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Mark Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Mark Miller

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Mark Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Mark Miller. The network helps show where M. Mark Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Mark Miller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Mark Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Mark Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Mark Miller. M. Mark Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Luther, Catherine A. & M. Mark Miller. (2005). Framing of the 2003 U.S.-Iraq War Demonstrations: An Analysis of News and Partisan Texts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 82(1). 78–96. 43 indexed citations

Miller, M. Mark, et al.. (1998). Framing the Candidates in Presidential Primaries: Issues and Images in Press Releases and News Coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 75(2). 312–324. 62 indexed citations

Miller, M. Mark. (1997). Frame Mapping and Analysis of News Coverage of Contentious Issues. Social Science Computer Review. 15(4). 367–378. 92 indexed citations

Miller, M. Mark & Julie L. Andsager. (1997). Protecting 1st Amendment?: Newspaper Coverage of Hate Speech. Newspaper Research Journal. 18(3-4). 2–15. 3 indexed citations

Andsager, Julie L. & M. Mark Miller. (1994). Willingness of Journalists and Public to Support Freedom of Expression. Newspaper Research Journal. 15(1). 102–114. 8 indexed citations

Miller, M. Mark & Bryan E. Denham. (1994). Horserace, Issue Coverage in Prestige Newspapers during 1988, 1992 Elections. Newspaper Research Journal. 15(4). 20–28. 6 indexed citations

Miller, M. Mark, et al.. (1991). Wire service coverage of the Exxon Valdez crisis. Public Relations Review. 17(1). 27–36. 22 indexed citations

Tims, Albert R. & M. Mark Miller. (1986). Determinants of attitudes toward foreign countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 10(4). 471–484. 10 indexed citations

Miller, M. Mark, et al.. (1986). Mass Media and Political Decision Making: Application of the Accumulated Information Model to the 1980 Presidential Election. Annals of the International Communication Association. 9(1). 642–657. 1 indexed citations

10.

Miller, M. Mark, et al.. (1984). The Effects of Bad News and Good News on a Newspaper's Image. Journalism Quarterly. 61(1). 3–65. 14 indexed citations

11.

Miller, M. Mark, et al.. (1984). Reliability of the News Direction Scale for Analysis of the Good-Bad News Dimension. Journalism Quarterly. 61(3). 524–528. 10 indexed citations

12.

Faber, Ronald J., Timothy P. Meyer, & M. Mark Miller. (1984). The effectiveness of health disclosures within children's television commercials. Journal of Broadcasting. 28(4). 463–476. 2 indexed citations

13.

Miller, M. Mark, et al.. (1982). Conformity to AAPOR Standards in Newspaper Reporting of Public Opinion Polls. Public Opinion Quarterly. 46(2). 243–243. 22 indexed citations

14.

Miller, M. Mark & Stephen D. Reese. (1982). MEDIA DEPENDENCY AS INTERACTION. Communication Research. 9(2). 227–248. 66 indexed citations

15.

Reese, Stephen D. & M. Mark Miller. (1981). Political Attitude Holding and Structure The Effects of Newspaper and Television News. Communication Research. 8(2). 167–188. 7 indexed citations

16.

Atkin, Charles K. & M. Mark Miller. (1981). Parental Mediation of Children’s Television News Learning. Communications. 7(1). 85–94. 1 indexed citations

17.

Miller, M. Mark & Stephen D. Reese. (1980). Media Dependency as Interaction: The Effects of Exposure and Reliance on Political Efficacy and Activity.. 3 indexed citations

18.

Reeves, Byron & M. Mark Miller. (1978). A multidimensional measure of children's identification with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting. 22(1). 71–86. 53 indexed citations

19.

Miller, M. Mark & Byron Reeves. (1976). Dramatic TV content and children's sex‐role stereotypes. Journal of Broadcasting. 20(1). 35–50. 71 indexed citations

20.

Miller, M. Mark. (1972). Task Orientation and Salience as Determinants of Source Utility. Journalism Quarterly. 49(4). 669–673. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact