M. Lea

1.1k total citations
12 papers, 770 citations indexed

About

M. Lea is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Communication and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Lea has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 770 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Communication and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in M. Lea's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). M. Lea is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). M. Lea collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. M. Lea's co-authors include Russell Spears, Tom Postmes, Leon Watts and Yanuar Nugroho and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Human Communication Research and Behaviour and Information Technology.

In The Last Decade

M. Lea

11 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Lea United Kingdom 6 380 376 311 97 91 12 770
Beheruz N. Sethna United States 8 321 0.8× 328 0.9× 318 1.0× 70 0.7× 69 0.8× 21 721
Renée A. Meyers United States 16 283 0.7× 229 0.6× 409 1.3× 27 0.3× 75 0.8× 48 818
Jong‐Eun Roselyn Lee United States 9 739 1.9× 256 0.7× 180 0.6× 87 0.9× 160 1.8× 12 983
Eun-Ju Lee United States 12 305 0.8× 225 0.6× 172 0.6× 87 0.9× 27 0.3× 22 587
Yoram M. Kalman Israel 12 145 0.4× 134 0.4× 122 0.4× 111 1.1× 146 1.6× 38 639
Jürgen Buder Germany 14 254 0.7× 341 0.9× 165 0.5× 40 0.4× 191 2.1× 30 823
Dennis S. Gouran United States 15 229 0.6× 267 0.7× 465 1.5× 24 0.2× 29 0.3× 45 793
Jenny Bronstein Israel 19 365 1.0× 350 0.9× 88 0.3× 37 0.4× 133 1.5× 61 980
Ulla Bunz United States 11 212 0.6× 230 0.6× 181 0.6× 75 0.8× 150 1.6× 22 628
Eric Wright United States 4 296 0.8× 381 1.0× 41 0.1× 131 1.4× 86 0.9× 4 798

Countries citing papers authored by M. Lea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Lea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Lea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Lea. The network helps show where M. Lea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Lea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Lea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Lea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Lea. M. Lea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Lea, M., et al.. (2025). Measuring regolith strength in reduced gravity environments in the laboratory. Review of Scientific Instruments. 96(6).
2.
Spears, Russell, M. Lea, & Tom Postmes. (2007). CMC and social identity.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 253–272. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lea, M., et al.. (2004). Cohesion in online groups. WIT transactions on information and communication technologies. 31. 3 indexed citations
4.
Lea, M., et al.. (2004). Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity. Behaviour and Information Technology. 24(2). 151–158. 128 indexed citations
5.
Watts, Leon, Yanuar Nugroho, & M. Lea. (2003). Engaging in email discussion: Conversational context and social identity in computer-mediated communication.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 3 indexed citations
6.
Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, & M. Lea. (2002). Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication.. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 37 indexed citations
7.
Spears, Russell, M. Lea, & Tom Postmes. (2000). On side: Purview, problems and prospects.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1–16. 4 indexed citations
8.
Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, & M. Lea. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research. 26(3). 341–371. 369 indexed citations
9.
Lea, M., et al.. (1999). Social identity, normative content, and "deindividuation" in computer-mediated groups. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 53 indexed citations
10.
Postmes, Tom, et al.. (1999). SIDE-VIEW: An interactive web environment to support group collaborative learning.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2. 1–4. 5 indexed citations
11.
Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, & M. Lea. (1999). Social identity, group norms, and "deindividuation" Lessons from computer-mediated communication for social influence in the group. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 164–183. 24 indexed citations
12.
Lea, M. & Russell Spears. (1991). COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 34(2). 283–301. 140 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026