M. den Hengst

476 total citations
26 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

M. den Hengst is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. den Hengst has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Information Systems, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in M. den Hengst's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (7 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (6 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers). M. den Hengst is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (7 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (6 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers). M. den Hengst collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. M. den Hengst's co-authors include Gert‐Jan de Vreede, Henk G. Sol, Mark Adkins, Alan Serrano, J. Appelman, H.G. Sol, Douglas L. Dean, Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten, Vlatka Hlupić and Wendy L. Currie and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of the Operational Research Society and Journal of Management Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

M. den Hengst

25 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. den Hengst Netherlands 11 125 84 64 62 52 26 322
J. Appelman Netherlands 5 69 0.6× 69 0.8× 88 1.4× 31 0.5× 58 1.1× 13 270
Craig K. Tyran United States 10 86 0.7× 83 1.0× 119 1.9× 50 0.8× 113 2.2× 27 350
Dorothy G. Dologite United States 10 115 0.9× 107 1.3× 33 0.5× 37 0.6× 50 1.0× 44 362
Randall Whitaker United States 9 49 0.4× 107 1.3× 85 1.3× 42 0.7× 33 0.6× 25 381
Dorrie DeLuca United States 7 73 0.6× 58 0.7× 83 1.3× 20 0.3× 94 1.8× 9 266
Joline Morrison United States 10 80 0.6× 99 1.2× 59 0.9× 37 0.6× 63 1.2× 23 416
Dawn R. Utley United States 10 64 0.5× 78 0.9× 27 0.4× 37 0.6× 33 0.6× 26 286
Linda A. Macaulay United Kingdom 13 83 0.7× 217 2.6× 45 0.7× 44 0.7× 47 0.9× 30 446
Kathy Schwalbe United States 4 196 1.6× 193 2.3× 28 0.4× 111 1.8× 44 0.8× 10 447
Tadhg Nagle Ireland 10 91 0.7× 65 0.8× 19 0.3× 55 0.9× 51 1.0× 39 319

Countries citing papers authored by M. den Hengst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. den Hengst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. den Hengst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. den Hengst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. den Hengst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. den Hengst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. den Hengst. The network helps show where M. den Hengst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. den Hengst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. den Hengst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. den Hengst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. den Hengst. M. den Hengst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lukosch, Stephan, et al.. (2020). Together We Can Make It Work! Toward a Design Framework for Inclusive and Participatory City-Making of Playable Cities. Frontiers in Computer Science. 2. 10 indexed citations
2.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2018). Comparison of Methodologies Used in Homicide Investigations to Collect, Prioritize, and Eliminate Persons of Interest: A Case Study of Three Dutch Real-World Homicide Cases. Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice. 14(4). 1166–1181. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hengst, M. den & Martijn Warnier. (2013). Cyber Crime in Privately Held Information Systems: Personal Data at Stake. 2009. 117–120. 3 indexed citations
4.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2012). Community of Intelligence: The Secret Behind Intelligence-Led Policing. 68. 22–29. 3 indexed citations
5.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2012). Different Information Organizations to Produce the Same High Quality Intelligence: An Overview of the Police Forces in the Netherlands1. Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice. 6(2). 187–193. 1 indexed citations
6.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2008). Involving users early on in the design process: closing the gap between mobile information services and their users. Electronic Markets. 19(1). 31–42. 15 indexed citations
7.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2007). How to increase GSS transition? A case study at a Dutch Police Force. 34. 15–15. 4 indexed citations
8.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2007). Using soft OR principles for collaborative simulation: a case study in the Dutch airline industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 58(5). 669–682. 26 indexed citations
9.
Hengst, M. den & Mark Adkins. (2007). Which collaboration patterns are most challenging: A global survey of facilitators. 9. 17–17. 18 indexed citations
10.
Hengst, M. den, et al.. (2006). Assessing the Quality of Collaborative Processes. 14. 16b–16b. 19 indexed citations
11.
Bragge, Johanna, M. den Hengst, Tuure Tuunanen, & Ville Virtanen. (2005). A Repeatable Collaboration Process for Developing a Road Map for Emerging New Technology Business: Case Mobile Marketing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 51(9). 198–1641. 6 indexed citations
12.
Hengst, M. den. (2005). Collaborative Modeling of Processes: What Facilitation Support Does a Group Need?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15. 15 indexed citations
13.
Hengst, M. den & Mark Adkins. (2005). The Demand Rate of Facilitation Functions. 43c–43c. 5 indexed citations
14.
Bragge, Johanna, M. den Hengst, Tuure Tuunanen, & Ville Virtanen. (2005). A Repeatable Collaboration Process for Developing a Road Map for Mobile Marketing. 3 indexed citations
15.
Hengst, M. den & H.G. Sol. (2005). The impact of information and communication technology on interorganizational coordination. 10–10. 13 indexed citations
16.
Appelman, J., M. den Hengst, Vlatka Hlupić, & Alan Serrano. (2005). Design of (Inter-) Organizational Systems: Collaboration & Modeling. 12–12. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hengst, M. den & Gert‐Jan de Vreede. (2004). Collaborative Business Engineering: A Decade of Lessons from the Field. Journal of Management Information Systems. 20(4). 85–114. 77 indexed citations
18.
Hengst, M. den, Vlatka Hlupić, & Wendy L. Currie. (2004). The increasing need for integrating simulation and collaboration to support change management programs. 8 pp.–8 pp.. 10 indexed citations
19.
Hengst, M. den & Henk G. Sol. (2001). The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Interorganizational Coordination: Guidelines from Theory. Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 4. 129–138. 29 indexed citations
20.
Hengst, M. den & Henk G. Sol. (2000). Proceedings of the International Workshop on Harbour, Maritime & Multimodal Logistics Modelling and Simulation. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Appelman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Craig K. Tyran Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dorothy G. Dologite Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Randall Whitaker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dorrie DeLuca Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joline Morrison Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dawn R. Utley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda A. Macaulay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathy Schwalbe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tadhg Nagle
Rankless by CCL
2026