M. de Jonge
Impact in
- Religious studies top 1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
- Archeology top 5%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 16
- Christian Theology and Mission 2
- Theology and Canon Law Studies 2
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 1
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 5
- Co-authors
- J. A. EmertonMichael FishbanePaul J. AchtemeierWilliam O. WalkerPheme PerkinsA.S. van der WoudeEngseng HoWilliam Gervase Clarence‐Smith
- Journals
- Novum Testamentum (4 papers)New Testament Studies (4 papers)Vigiliae Christianae (4 papers)Journal of Biblical Literature (2 papers)Journal for the Study of Judaism (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
M. de Jonge
20 papers receiving 138 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Religious studies 121
- Archeology 68
- Anthropology 28
- Sociology and Political Science 128
- Philosophy 24
Countries citing papers authored by M. de Jonge
This map shows the geographic impact of M. de Jonge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. de Jonge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. de Jonge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. de Jonge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. de Jonge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. de Jonge. The network helps show where M. de Jonge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. de Jonge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ecologische en ecotoxicologische toestand van de Dommel voor de sanering van de waterbodem | 2007 | 1 |
| 2 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 64 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 41 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1971 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1966 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 4 |
About M. de Jonge
M. de Jonge is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Classics, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 222 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (16 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (121 citations), Archeology (68 citations), Anthropology (28 citations), Sociology and Political Science (128 citations) and Philosophy (24 citations). M. de Jonge has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Emerton, Michael Fishbane, Paul J. Achtemeier, William O. Walker, Pheme Perkins, A.S. van der Woude, Engseng Ho, William Gervase Clarence‐Smith, Syed Farid Alatas and Sumit K. Mandal. Their work appears in journals such as Novum Testamentum, New Testament Studies, Vigiliae Christianae, Journal of Biblical Literature and Journal for the Study of Judaism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.