Vigiliae Christianae

2.2k papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Vigiliae Christianae in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Vigiliae Christianae usually cover Archeology (798 papers), Religious studies (781 papers) and Classics (618 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (623 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (527 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (514 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vigiliae Christianae are G. Quispel, J. C. M. van Winden, David T. Runia, Christine Mohrmann, Robert M. Grant, Birger Pearson, G. J. M. Bartelink, G. D. Kilpatrick, J. den Boeft and Johannes van Oort.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Vigiliae Christianae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vigiliae Christianae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vigiliae Christianae.

Countries where authors publish in Vigiliae Christianae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vigiliae Christianae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vigiliae Christianae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vigiliae Christianae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025