M. C. Appleby
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
-
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Papers in
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 10
- Livestock and Poultry Management 7
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 8
- Co-authors
- Andrew Balmford (1 shared paper)Camilla Toulmin (1 shared paper)Philip K. Thornton (1 shared paper)B. O. Hughes (6 shared papers)Mario Herrero (1 shared paper)Liam Dolan (1 shared paper)Marian Stamp Dawkins (1 shared paper)David Fraser (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (5 papers)British Poultry Science (4 papers)Animal Welfare (2 papers)Research in Veterinary Science (1 paper)Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaPortugal
In The Last Decade
M. C. Appleby
16 papers receiving 1.7k citations
M. C. Appleby's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Small Animals 417
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 325
- Animal Science and Zoology 371
- Soil Science 194
- Ecology 475
Countries citing papers authored by M. C. Appleby
This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Appleby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Appleby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Appleby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. Appleby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Appleby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Appleby. The network helps show where M. C. Appleby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. C. Appleby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 1162 |
| 2 | One Welfare – a platform for improving human and animal welfare Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 252 |
| 3 | 2002 | 139 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 97 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1 |
About M. C. Appleby
M. C. Appleby is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (7 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (2 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (1 paper), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (417 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (325 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (371 citations), Soil Science (194 citations) and Ecology (475 citations). M. C. Appleby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Balmford, Camilla Toulmin, Philip K. Thornton, B. O. Hughes, Mario Herrero, Liam Dolan, Marian Stamp Dawkins, David Fraser, Pete Smith and Barbara Burlingame. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, British Poultry Science, Animal Welfare, Research in Veterinary Science and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.