M. A. Gell

426 citations
31 papers · 306 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M. A. Gell

28 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

M. A. Gell
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 219
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 160
  • Materials Chemistry 124
  • Condensed Matter Physics 22
  • Management Science and Operations Research 13
Replace Bo Su with:
Bo Su United States
Gregory D. Adams United States
Valentin Rychkov France
Lukas Fricke Germany
Matthew Trainer United Kingdom
Ting Ning China
G.A. Swartz United States
F. Coccetti France
M. G. Ryschkewitsch United States
Yating Yang China
M. A. Gell relative to Bo Su United States Bo Su's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Bo Su · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. A. Gell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. A. Gell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. A. Gell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. A. Gell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. A. Gell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. A. Gell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. A. Gell. The network helps show where M. A. Gell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside M. A. Gell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. A. Gell Line = papers co-authored together M. A. Gell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198875
2 198774
3 200634
4 198924
5 198921
6 199110
7 19909
8 20107
9 19897
10 19936
11 19906
12 19945
13 19915
14 19924
15 19903
16 19932
17 19902
18 19902
19 20021
20 19901

About M. A. Gell

M. A. Gell is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 31 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (13 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (11 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (6 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (3 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (3 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (219 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (160 citations), Materials Chemistry (124 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (22 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (13 citations). M. A. Gell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Bradley, M. Jaroš, D. Ninno, D. J. Wolford, Lili Yang, Christian W. Dawson, M. Brown, A. C. Churchill, Iqbal Adjali and C. J. Gibbings. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Semiconductor Science and Technology, Applied Physics Letters, European Transactions on Telecommunications and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact