Lynne ForsterLee
- Law top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Irwin A. HorowitzMartin J. BourgeoisRobert HoJon GraheKenneth S BordensNicole BrownAine McGovernKaren Whitehill King
- Topics
- Jury Decision Making Processes (15 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PsychologyPersonality and Individual DifferencesApplied Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lynne ForsterLee
17 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Law 180
- Social Psychology 93
- Sociology and Political Science 87
- Gender Studies 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 60
Countries citing papers authored by Lynne ForsterLee
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynne ForsterLee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynne ForsterLee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynne ForsterLee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lynne ForsterLee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynne ForsterLee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynne ForsterLee. The network helps show where Lynne ForsterLee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynne ForsterLee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynne ForsterLee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynne ForsterLee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynne ForsterLee. Lynne ForsterLee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | Dealing with the guilty offender | 0 |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Dealing with the guilty offender: Psychological aspects of sentencing decisions in research, practice and policy. | 1 |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2 |
About Lynne ForsterLee
Lynne ForsterLee is a scholar working on Law, General Decision Sciences and Gender Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jury Decision Making Processes (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (180 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations) and Gender Studies (69 citations). Lynne ForsterLee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Irwin A. Horowitz, Martin J. Bourgeois, Robert Ho, Jon Grahe, Kenneth S Bordens, Nicole Brown, Aine McGovern, Karen Whitehill King and Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.