Lynn Cherkas
About
In The Last Decade
Lynn Cherkas
8 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Management of Technology and Innovation 136
- Social Psychology 63
- Clinical Psychology 61
- Psychiatry and Mental health 55
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Lynn Cherkas
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn Cherkas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn Cherkas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn Cherkas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lynn Cherkas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn Cherkas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn Cherkas. The network helps show where Lynn Cherkas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynn Cherkas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynn Cherkas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynn Cherkas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynn Cherkas. Lynn Cherkas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exceptional experiences amongst twins. | 1 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 109 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 88 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 34 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.