Lydia O’Sullivan

424 total citations
27 papers, 215 citations indexed

About

Lydia O’Sullivan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Lydia O’Sullivan has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 215 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Lydia O’Sullivan's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). Lydia O’Sullivan is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). Lydia O’Sullivan collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Lydia O’Sullivan's co-authors include Peter Doran, Rachel Crowley, Éilish McAuliffe, Cormac Small, Lai Ma, P. Thirion, Dayle Hacking, Conor D. Collins, Mary Dunne and Edelweiss Aldasoro and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

Lydia O’Sullivan

25 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lydia O’Sullivan Ireland 9 70 63 58 28 24 27 215
Sudha Amarnath United States 10 63 0.9× 87 1.4× 57 1.0× 42 1.5× 16 0.7× 23 386
Donald E. Stanley United States 7 57 0.8× 43 0.7× 49 0.8× 50 1.8× 10 0.4× 14 260
Poonam Misra United States 6 177 2.5× 87 1.4× 57 1.0× 40 1.4× 10 0.4× 11 391
Shruti Jayakumar United Kingdom 9 35 0.5× 36 0.6× 71 1.2× 62 2.2× 2 0.1× 25 281
Kathleen Bickel United States 8 51 0.7× 166 2.6× 26 0.4× 18 0.6× 15 0.6× 20 248
Sara Lankshear Canada 11 129 1.8× 102 1.6× 25 0.4× 25 0.9× 8 0.3× 20 326
Lauren Steward United States 8 69 1.0× 33 0.5× 60 1.0× 35 1.3× 26 1.1× 16 303
Pamela A. Propeck United States 8 46 0.7× 127 2.0× 80 1.4× 13 0.5× 22 0.9× 21 302
John Harding Australia 7 44 0.6× 46 0.7× 30 0.5× 35 1.3× 15 0.6× 11 360
Tobias Weberschock Germany 9 33 0.5× 41 0.7× 43 0.7× 24 0.9× 6 0.3× 30 222

Countries citing papers authored by Lydia O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lydia O’Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lydia O’Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lydia O’Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lydia O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lydia O’Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lydia O’Sullivan. The network helps show where Lydia O’Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lydia O’Sullivan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lydia O’Sullivan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lydia O’Sullivan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lydia O’Sullivan. Lydia O’Sullivan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, Kirsty O’Brien, Susan Ahern, et al.. (2024). Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT Radiotracers in Staging and Restaging of Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer or Biochemical Recurrence: An Overview of Reviews. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 55(5). 680–700. 2 indexed citations
5.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, et al.. (2022). Ethical values and principles to guide the fair allocation of resources in response to a pandemic: a rapid systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics. 23(1). 70–70. 17 indexed citations
7.
Love, Sharon, Elizabeth C. Ward, Katie Keen, et al.. (2022). What is the purpose of clinical trial monitoring?. Trials. 23(1). 836–836. 5 indexed citations
8.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, et al.. (2022). Factors influencing the statistical planning, design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trials in health care: A systematic review. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 26. 100897–100897. 1 indexed citations
9.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, et al.. (2021). Preparing accessible and understandable clinical research participant information leaflets and consent forms: a set of guidelines from an expert consensus conference. Research Involvement and Engagement. 7(1). 31–31. 23 indexed citations
10.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, Ronan P. Killeen, Peter Doran, & Rachel Crowley. (2021). Adherence with reporting of ethical standards in COVID-19 human studies: a rapid review. BMC Medical Ethics. 22(1). 80–80. 7 indexed citations
12.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, Rachel Crowley, Éilish McAuliffe, & Peter Doran. (2020). Contributory factors to the evolution of the concept and practice of informed consent in clinical research: A narrative review. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 19. 100634–100634. 12 indexed citations
13.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, et al.. (2020). An investigation into the factors affecting investigator-initiated trial start-up in Ireland. Trials. 21(1). 962–962. 4 indexed citations
14.
Galligan, Marie, et al.. (2020). A protocol for a systematic review investigating the factors influencing the statistical planning, design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trials. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 36–36. 1 indexed citations
15.
O’Sullivan, Lydia, Ronan P. Killeen, Peter Doran, & Rachel Crowley. (2020). Ethical Considerations for safeguarding human participants in pandemic research: a rapid review protocol. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 22–22. 1 indexed citations
16.
Thirion, P., Mary Dunne, Paul Kelly, et al.. (2020). Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression. British Journal of Cancer. 122(9). 1315–1323. 21 indexed citations
17.
Armstrong, John G., P. Thirion, Mary Dunne, et al.. (2018). Cancer Trials Ireland (ICORG) 06-34: A multi-centre clinical trial using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy to reduce the toxicity of palliative radiation for lung cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 127(2). 253–258. 11 indexed citations
18.
Curran, Brendan, et al.. (2018). A novel dynamic arc treatment planning solution to reduce dose to small bowel in preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Medical dosimetry. 44(3). 258–265. 5 indexed citations
19.
Cagney, Daniel, Mary Dunne, Marie Finn, et al.. (2017). Heterogeneity in high-risk prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy. BMC Urology. 17(1). 60–60. 5 indexed citations
20.
Mankin, Kelley M. Thieman, Ashley B. Saunders, Janice M. Bright, et al.. (2016). Patent ductus arteriosus in cats (Felis catus): 50 cases (2000–2015). Journal of Veterinary Cardiology. 19(1). 35–43. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026