Karen Cardwell
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Infectious Diseases
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Cristín RyanCarmel HughesSusan M. SmithBarbara ClyneFrank MoriartyMichelle O’NeillPatricia HarringtonMáirín Ryan
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (12 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers)SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBMJ OpenJournal of Infection
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Karen Cardwell
21 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 204
- Economics and Econometrics 92
- Infectious Diseases 69
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 63
- General Health Professions 58
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Cardwell
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Cardwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Cardwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Cardwell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Cardwell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Cardwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Cardwell. The network helps show where Karen Cardwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Cardwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Cardwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Cardwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Cardwell. Karen Cardwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 86 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 92 |
About Karen Cardwell
Karen Cardwell is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 25 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (204 citations), Family Practice (36 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (42 citations). Karen Cardwell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Cristín Ryan, Carmel Hughes, Susan M. Smith, Barbara Clyne, Frank Moriarty, Michelle O’Neill, Patricia Harrington, Máirín Ryan, Laura McCullagh and Kieran Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMJ Open and Journal of Infection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.