John G. Armstrong
- Surgery top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Oncology top 2%
- Otorhinolaryngology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Louis B. HarrisonMichael J. ZeléfskyDaniel FassElliót W. StrongRonald H. SpiroL.B. HarrisonZvi FuksRobert J. Pierce
- Topics
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (21 papers)Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers)Head and Neck Cancer Studies (15 papers)
- Cited by
- OtorhinolaryngologyRadiationOncology
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineCancer
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
John G. Armstrong
95 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Surgery 1.5k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.3k
- Oncology 1.2k
- Otorhinolaryngology 769
- Epidemiology 738
Countries citing papers authored by John G. Armstrong
This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Armstrong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Armstrong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Armstrong. The network helps show where John G. Armstrong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Armstrong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Armstrong. John G. Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 372 | |
| 9 | 359 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 72 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 58 |
About John G. Armstrong
John G. Armstrong is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Radiation and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 99 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (21 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (769 citations), Radiation (464 citations) and Oncology (1.2k citations). John G. Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Louis B. Harrison, Michael J. Zeléfsky, Daniel Fass, Elliót W. Strong, Ronald H. Spiro, L.B. Harrison, Zvi Fuks, Robert J. Pierce, Jatin P. Shah and Ronald R. Grunstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.