Marie‐Luise Dierks

1.8k total citations
127 papers, 969 citations indexed

About

Marie‐Luise Dierks is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Marie‐Luise Dierks has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 969 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 99 papers in General Health Professions, 26 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 17 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Marie‐Luise Dierks's work include Health and Medical Studies (43 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (24 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (24 papers). Marie‐Luise Dierks is often cited by papers focused on Health and Medical Studies (43 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (24 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (24 papers). Marie‐Luise Dierks collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Marie‐Luise Dierks's co-authors include Ulrike Junius‐Walker, Isabel Voigt, Eva Hummers, Eva Maria Bitzer, Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz, Anke Bramesfeld, Christopher Kofahl, Eva‐Maria Bitzer, Martin Härter and Bernt‐Peter Robra and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Marie‐Luise Dierks

116 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marie‐Luise Dierks Germany 18 579 213 182 173 101 127 969
Jo Ellins United Kingdom 9 666 1.2× 217 1.0× 105 0.6× 131 0.8× 73 0.7× 26 1.0k
Suzanne Heurtin‐Roberts United States 15 591 1.0× 225 1.1× 172 0.9× 212 1.2× 186 1.8× 23 1.2k
Sarah Ono United States 18 563 1.0× 174 0.8× 134 0.7× 107 0.6× 89 0.9× 55 949
Cynthia Vinson United States 14 770 1.3× 286 1.3× 171 0.9× 63 0.4× 143 1.4× 35 1.1k
Kimberly Manalili Canada 10 614 1.1× 258 1.2× 105 0.6× 102 0.6× 95 0.9× 20 985
Barry I. Graubard United States 4 246 0.4× 202 0.9× 141 0.8× 157 0.9× 170 1.7× 7 956
Rebecca Lobb United States 18 448 0.8× 329 1.5× 137 0.8× 164 0.9× 292 2.9× 38 1.2k
Bryan Leyva United States 17 483 0.8× 175 0.8× 121 0.7× 114 0.7× 198 2.0× 32 1.1k
Zoë Skea United Kingdom 13 596 1.0× 220 1.0× 80 0.4× 115 0.7× 63 0.6× 30 940
Deborah L. Burnet United States 19 523 0.9× 235 1.1× 113 0.6× 239 1.4× 29 0.3× 38 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Marie‐Luise Dierks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marie‐Luise Dierks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie‐Luise Dierks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie‐Luise Dierks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marie‐Luise Dierks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie‐Luise Dierks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie‐Luise Dierks. The network helps show where Marie‐Luise Dierks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marie‐Luise Dierks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marie‐Luise Dierks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marie‐Luise Dierks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marie‐Luise Dierks. Marie‐Luise Dierks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pieper, Dawid, et al.. (2025). Recruiting participants for focus groups in health research: a meta-research study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 25(1). 9–9. 2 indexed citations
2.
Apfelbacher, Christian, Eva Maria Bitzer, Susanne Brandstetter, et al.. (2025). Translating and communicating evidence on allergy prevention in children to parents: implementation study protocol. Archives of Public Health. 83(1). 36–36.
3.
Heinsohn, Torben, et al.. (2024). Tuberculosis case fatality is higher in male than female patients in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection. 52(5). 1775–1786. 7 indexed citations
4.
Wiesemann, Claudia, et al.. (2024). Digital Transformation in Patient Organizations: Interview and Focus Group Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27. e62750–e62750.
5.
Hartmann, Marius, et al.. (2023). Gesundheitskompetenz am Arbeitsplatz stärken – Geko-A. Das Gesundheitswesen. 85(08/09). 772–772. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bitzer, Eva Maria, et al.. (2023). How do parents access, appraise, and apply health information on early childhood allergy prevention? A focus group and interview study. Frontiers in Public Health. 11. 1123107–1123107. 3 indexed citations
7.
8.
9.
Dierks, Marie‐Luise, et al.. (2020). Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Focus group discussions. Health Expectations. 23(3). 670–680. 15 indexed citations
10.
11.
Brandes, Ivo F., et al.. (2018). Klinisch-anamnestische Charakteristika in der neurologischen MBOR: Notwendigkeit einer qualitativen BBPL-Identifikation. Der Nervenarzt. 89(2). 169–177. 2 indexed citations
12.
Härter, Martin, Jörg Dirmaier, Isabelle Scholl, et al.. (2017). The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany. Les Temps Modernes. 123-124(576). 46–51. 52 indexed citations
13.
Seidel, G, et al.. (2014). Sind Informationsmaterialien zur Darmkrebsfrüherkennung in Deutschland verständlich oder verfehlen sie ihre Wirkung?. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 57(3). 366–379. 8 indexed citations
14.
Seidel, G, et al.. (2014). Sind Informationsmaterialien zur Darmkrebsfrüherkennung in Deutschland verständlich oder verfehlen sie ihre Wirkung?: Bewertung von Gesundheitsinformationen durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer mit unterschiedlichem Bildungshintergrund. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 57(3). 366–379. 1 indexed citations
15.
Walter, Ulla, et al.. (2013). Patientengerechte Gesundheitsversorgung für Hochbetagte. 1 indexed citations
16.
Dreier, Maren, et al.. (2013). Development of a comprehensive list of criteria for evaluating consumer education materials on colorectal cancer screening. BMC Public Health. 13(1). 843–843. 12 indexed citations
17.
Junius‐Walker, Ulrike, et al.. (2012). What is important, what needs treating? How GPs perceive older patients’ multiple health problems: a mixed method research study. BMC Research Notes. 5(1). 443–443. 12 indexed citations
18.
Gerlinger, Thomas, Birgit Babitsch, Gabriele Bolte, et al.. (2012). Situation und Perspektiven von Public Health in Deutschland – Forschung und Lehre. Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Public Health e. V.. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 74(11). 1 indexed citations
19.
Schaeffer, Doris, et al.. (2005). Evaluation der Modellprojekte zur unabhängigen Patientenberatung und Nutzerinformation. European Journal of Pharmacology. 502(1-2). 11–9. 5 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jo Ellins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Suzanne Heurtin‐Roberts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Ono Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cynthia Vinson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kimberly Manalili Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barry I. Graubard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Lobb Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bryan Leyva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zoë Skea Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah L. Burnet
Rankless by CCL
2026