North Carolina Medical Journal

1.6k papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in North Carolina Medical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in North Carolina Medical Journal usually cover General Health Professions (580 papers), Economics and Econometrics (272 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (264 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (216 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (209 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in North Carolina Medical Journal are Kathryn E. Weaver, Michelle J. Naughton, Giselle Corbie‐Smith, Jacqueline Nesi, Gregg Nelson, Paul A. Buescher, Scott Proescholdbell, H. Kim Lyerly, Julia Kravchenko and Peter J. Morris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in North Carolina Medical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in North Carolina Medical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in North Carolina Medical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in North Carolina Medical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in North Carolina Medical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in North Carolina Medical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites North Carolina Medical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025