Luke N. Condra
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Demography
- Gender Studies
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Jacob N. ShapiroAustin L. WrightSera LinardiJames D. LongAndrew ShaverMohammad IsaqzadehRadha IyengarMichael Callen
- Topics
- Political Conflict and Governance (8 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers)Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Luke N. Condra
10 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Sociology and Political Science 292
- Political Science and International Relations 145
- Demography 24
- Gender Studies 22
- Economics and Econometrics 18
Countries citing papers authored by Luke N. Condra
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke N. Condra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke N. Condra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke N. Condra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke N. Condra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke N. Condra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke N. Condra. The network helps show where Luke N. Condra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke N. Condra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke N. Condra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke N. Condra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke N. Condra. Luke N. Condra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 185 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Who Takes the Blame? The Strategic Effects of Collateral Damage | 3 |
| 12 | Ethnic Rebellion against the State: Perils of the Periphery | 1 |
About Luke N. Condra
Luke N. Condra is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (8 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers) and Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (292 citations), Political Science and International Relations (145 citations) and Development (17 citations). Luke N. Condra has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jacob N. Shapiro, Austin L. Wright, Sera Linardi, James D. Long, Andrew Shaver, Mohammad Isaqzadeh, Radha Iyengar, Michael Callen, Joseph Felter and Stephen J. Stapleton. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.