Luke Jones
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jim DenisonEllen PoliakoffJ. H. WeardenJohn TonerEmma GowenDaniel PooleClare S. AllelyDarren J. Paul
- Topics
- Sport Psychology and Performance (18 papers)Sports, Gender, and Society (11 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationCognitive Neuroscience
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Experimental Psychology GeneralFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Luke Jones
39 papers receiving 439 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cognitive Neuroscience 176
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 163
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
- Sociology and Political Science 93
- Social Psychology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Jones. The network helps show where Luke Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Jones. Luke Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Luke Jones
Luke Jones is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 40 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (18 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (11 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (163 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (50 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (176 citations). Luke Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jim Denison, Ellen Poliakoff, J. H. Wearden, John Toner, Emma Gowen, Daniel Poole, Clare S. Allely, Darren J. Paul, Paul Read and Ruth Ogden. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.