Emilie Savage‐Smith
- Archeology top 5%
- History top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter E. PormannMona NasserYossef RapoportJeremy JohnsEvelyn EdsonDonald R. HillJosef van EssTerry Jones
- Topics
- Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (17 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (11 papers)History of Medicine Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIran
In The Last Decade
Emilie Savage‐Smith
32 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Archeology 91
- History 90
- Political Science and International Relations 47
- Sociology and Political Science 43
- Anthropology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Emilie Savage‐Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Emilie Savage‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emilie Savage‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emilie Savage‐Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emilie Savage‐Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emilie Savage‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emilie Savage‐Smith. The network helps show where Emilie Savage‐Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emilie Savage‐Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emilie Savage‐Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emilie Savage‐Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emilie Savage‐Smith. Emilie Savage‐Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | The key to medicine and a guide for students | 2 |
| 6 | 79 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Der mittelalterliche Kosmos : Karten der christlichen und islamischen Welt | 2 |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | Medieval views of the Cosmos | 2 |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Science, tools & magic | 1 |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | John Channing: eighteenth-century apothecary and Arabist. | 1 |
| 16 | Drug therapy of eye diseases in seventeenth-century Islamic medicine. The influence of the "New chemistry" of the Paracelsians. | 6 |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | Ibn al-Nafīs's Perfected book on ophthalmology and his treatment of trachoma and its sequelae. | 0 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Emilie Savage‐Smith
Emilie Savage‐Smith is a scholar working on Archeology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and History, having authored 36 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (17 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (11 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (91 citations), History (90 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). Emilie Savage‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Peter E. Pormann, Mona Nasser, Yossef Rapoport, Jeremy Johns, Evelyn Edson, Donald R. Hill, Josef van Ess, Terry Jones and Julian Raby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Technology and Culture and Isis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.