Guy Geltner
Impact in
Papers in
- History 10
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- History of Medicine Studies 2
-
- Medieval and Early Modern Justice 8
- Co-authors
- Carole Rawcliffe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Speculum (2 papers)Urban History (2 papers)Past & Present (1 paper)The English Historical Review (1 paper)Anuario de Estudios Medievales (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Guy Geltner
26 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Classics 48
- History 84
- History and Philosophy of Science 31
- Space and Planetary Science 5
- Geography, Planning and Development 14
Countries citing papers authored by Guy Geltner
This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Geltner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Geltner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Geltner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Geltner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Geltner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Geltner. The network helps show where Guy Geltner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Guy Geltner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 17 | Finding Matter out of Place: Bologna’s fango ('dirt') notary in the history of premodern public health | 2014 | 4 |
| 18 | No-woman’s land? On female crime and incarceration, past, present, and future | 2010 | 4 |
| 19 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 3 |
About Guy Geltner
Guy Geltner is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Classics, Economics and Econometrics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Early Modern Justice (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (48 citations), History (84 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations), Space and Planetary Science (5 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (14 citations). Guy Geltner has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carole Rawcliffe. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Urban History, Past & Present, The English Historical Review and Anuario de Estudios Medievales.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.