This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Church's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Church with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Church more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Church. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Church. The network helps show where Luke Church may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Church
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Church.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Church based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Church. Luke Church is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Söderberg, Emma, Luke Church, Jürgen Börstler, Diederick C. Niehorster, & Christofer Rydenfält. (2022). What's bothering developers in code review?. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 341–342.
4.
Söderberg, Emma, Luke Church, Jürgen Börstler, Diederick C. Niehorster, & Christofer Rydenfält. (2022). What's bothering developers in code review?. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 341–342.1 indexed citations
Church, Luke & Emma Söderberg. (2021). Probes and Sensors: The Design of Feedback Loops for Usability Improvements. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 124–137.1 indexed citations
7.
Blackwell, Alan F., Marian Petre, & Luke Church. (2019). Fifty years of the psychology of programming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 131. 52–63.15 indexed citations
Blackwell, Alan F., et al.. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Cognitive Dimensions.. PPIG. 3.2 indexed citations
10.
Church, Luke, et al.. (2016). A fox not a hedgehog: What does PPIG know?. PPIG. 3.1 indexed citations
11.
Macvean, Andrew, et al.. (2016). API Usability at Scale. PPIG. 26.3 indexed citations
12.
Church, Luke, et al.. (2016). Software and How it Lives On - Embedding Live Programs in the World Around Them.. PPIG. 19.7 indexed citations
13.
Church, Luke, et al.. (2015). An empirical investigation of code completion usage by professional software developers.. PPIG. 14.6 indexed citations
14.
Church, Luke, et al.. (2012). Sketching by Programming in the Choreographic Language Agent. PPIG. 16.5 indexed citations
15.
Eckert, Claudia, Alan F. Blackwell, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl, & Luke Church. (2012). Sketching across design domains: Roles and formalities. Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing. 26(3). 245–266.22 indexed citations
16.
Church, Luke, et al.. (2010). Liveness in Notation Use: From Music to Programming.. PPIG. 2.6 indexed citations
17.
Church, Luke, et al.. (2009). Privacy stories. 1–1.19 indexed citations
18.
Blackwell, Alan F., Luke Church, & Thomas R. G. Green. (2008). The Abstract is 'an Enemy': Alternative Perspectives to Computational Thinking. PPIG. 5.18 indexed citations
19.
Blackwell, Alan F., et al.. (2007). Tangible Interaction in a Mobile Context.1 indexed citations
20.
Church, Luke. (2005). Introducing #Dasher, A continuous gesture IDE, A work in progress paper.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.