Luke A. Gliddon

740 total citations
7 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

Luke A. Gliddon is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke A. Gliddon has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Luke A. Gliddon's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). Luke A. Gliddon is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). Luke A. Gliddon collaborates with scholars based in United States. Luke A. Gliddon's co-authors include Justin J. Anker, Marilyn E. Carroll, Erin B. Larson, Jennifer L. Perry, Natalie E. Zlebnik, Rutul R. Shah, David W. LaFleur, Mallika Singh, Stephen Brimijoin and Yang Gao and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Luke A. Gliddon

7 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Luke A. Gliddon United States	7	405	151	147	123	91	7	585
Nicole H. Mutschler United States	12	427 1.1×	194 1.3×	239 1.6×	155 1.3×	65 0.7×	12	632
Kimber L. Price United States	14	341 0.8×	80 0.5×	147 1.0×	92 0.7×	187 2.1×	16	676
Natalie E. Zlebnik United States	20	681 1.7×	187 1.2×	184 1.3×	209 1.7×	163 1.8×	36	940
A.M.J. Montgomery United Kingdom	13	306 0.8×	111 0.7×	55 0.4×	105 0.9×	82 0.9×	28	546
Ryan T. Lacy United States	15	292 0.7×	126 0.8×	85 0.6×	105 0.9×	77 0.8×	28	501
Dean Wade United States	13	377 0.9×	101 0.7×	89 0.6×	238 1.9×	76 0.8×	34	605
Rebecca S. Hofford United States	17	376 0.9×	155 1.0×	157 1.1×	231 1.9×	85 0.9×	41	674
Karen G. Anderson United States	15	447 1.1×	73 0.5×	46 0.3×	117 1.0×	202 2.2×	34	682
T. Sylvie United States	13	888 2.2×	150 1.0×	103 0.7×	382 3.1×	148 1.6×	14	1.0k
Nichole M. Neugebauer‎ United States	18	451 1.1×	86 0.6×	62 0.4×	362 2.9×	79 0.9×	33	685

Countries citing papers authored by Luke A. Gliddon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke A. Gliddon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke A. Gliddon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke A. Gliddon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke A. Gliddon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke A. Gliddon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke A. Gliddon. The network helps show where Luke A. Gliddon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke A. Gliddon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke A. Gliddon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke A. Gliddon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke A. Gliddon. Luke A. Gliddon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Zlebnik, Natalie E., Justin J. Anker, Luke A. Gliddon, & Marilyn E. Carroll. (2010). Reduction of extinction and reinstatement of cocaine seeking by wheel running in female rats. Psychopharmacology. 209(1). 113–125. 68 indexed citations

Anker, Justin J., Jennifer L. Perry, Luke A. Gliddon, & Marilyn E. Carroll. (2009). Impulsivity predicts the escalation of cocaine self-administration in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 93(3). 343–348. 145 indexed citations

Anker, Justin J., Natalie E. Zlebnik, Luke A. Gliddon, & Marilyn E. Carroll. (2009). Performance under a Go/No-go task in rats selected for high and low impulsivity with a delay-discounting procedure. Behavioural Pharmacology. 20(5-6). 406–414. 19 indexed citations

Brimijoin, Stephen, Yang Gao, Justin J. Anker, et al.. (2008). A Cocaine Hydrolase Engineered from Human Butyrylcholinesterase Selectively Blocks Cocaine Toxicity and Reinstatement of Drug Seeking in Rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 33(11). 2715–2725. 108 indexed citations

Anker, Justin J., Luke A. Gliddon, & Marilyn E. Carroll. (2008). Impulsivity on a Go/No-go task for intravenous cocaine or food in male and female rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake. Behavioural Pharmacology. 19(5-6). 615–629. 41 indexed citations

Larson, Erin B., et al.. (2007). Effects of estrogen and progesterone on the escalation of cocaine self-administration in female rats during extended access.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 15(5). 461–471. 111 indexed citations

Anker, Justin J., Erin B. Larson, Luke A. Gliddon, & Marilyn E. Carroll. (2007). Effects of progesterone on the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in female rats.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 15(5). 472–480. 93 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact