Kimber L. Price

802 total citations
16 papers, 676 citations indexed

About

Kimber L. Price is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kimber L. Price has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 676 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kimber L. Price's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers). Kimber L. Price is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers). Kimber L. Price collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kimber L. Price's co-authors include Aimee L. McRae‐Clark, Kathleen T. Brady, Michael E. Saladin, Stacia M. DeSantis, Nathaniel L. Baker, Sudie E. Back, Annie N. Simpson, Megan M. Moran‐Santa Maria, Eve G. Spratt and Lawrence D. Middaugh and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Psychopharmacology and Behavioural Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Kimber L. Price

16 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kimber L. Price United States 14 341 187 147 111 100 16 676
Verica Milivojevic United States 16 397 1.2× 277 1.5× 255 1.7× 113 1.0× 116 1.2× 31 870
Kristen M. Siedlarz United States 8 338 1.0× 139 0.7× 281 1.9× 166 1.5× 131 1.3× 10 882
Sara K. Blaine United States 12 217 0.6× 187 1.0× 193 1.3× 102 0.9× 85 0.8× 22 667
Sandra Villafuerte United States 15 179 0.5× 108 0.6× 121 0.8× 88 0.8× 169 1.7× 21 583
Anna H. V. Söderpalm United States 11 307 0.9× 125 0.7× 169 1.1× 70 0.6× 47 0.5× 12 618
Andrea Dlugos United States 14 265 0.8× 135 0.7× 134 0.9× 78 0.7× 115 1.1× 17 731
Mark J. Williams United States 12 243 0.7× 112 0.6× 189 1.3× 44 0.4× 51 0.5× 15 598
Kate Baicy United States 6 211 0.6× 209 1.1× 56 0.4× 105 0.9× 113 1.1× 8 624
Anna Rose Childress United States 10 632 1.9× 244 1.3× 130 0.9× 110 1.0× 85 0.8× 12 857
Alexandra Soliman Canada 8 238 0.7× 228 1.2× 103 0.7× 108 1.0× 92 0.9× 9 713

Countries citing papers authored by Kimber L. Price

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimber L. Price's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimber L. Price with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimber L. Price more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimber L. Price

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimber L. Price. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimber L. Price. The network helps show where Kimber L. Price may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimber L. Price

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimber L. Price. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimber L. Price based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimber L. Price. Kimber L. Price is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Saladin, Michael E., Steven D. LaRowe, Annie N. Simpson, et al.. (2012). Does Alexithymia Explain Variation in Cue‐Elicited Craving Reported by Methamphetamine‐Dependent Individuals?. American Journal on Addictions. 21(2). 130–135. 29 indexed citations
2.
Tolliver, Bryan K., Kimber L. Price, Nathaniel L. Baker, et al.. (2012). Impaired Cognitive Performance in Subjects with Methamphetamine Dependence during Exposure to Neutral versus Methamphetamine-Related Cues. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 38(3). 251–259. 28 indexed citations
3.
Price, Kimber L., Nathaniel L. Baker, Aimee L. McRae‐Clark, et al.. (2012). A randomized, placebo-controlled laboratory study of the effects of d-cycloserine on craving in cocaine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology. 226(4). 739–746. 44 indexed citations
4.
Price, Kimber L., Stacia M. DeSantis, Annie N. Simpson, et al.. (2011). The Impact of Clinical and Demographic Variables on Cognitive Performance in Methamphetamine-Dependent Individuals in Rural South Carolina. American Journal on Addictions. 20(5). 447–455. 24 indexed citations
5.
McRae‐Clark, Aimee L., Rickey E. Carter, Kimber L. Price, et al.. (2011). Stress- and cue-elicited craving and reactivity in marijuana-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology. 218(1). 49–58. 60 indexed citations
6.
Price, Kimber L., Michael E. Saladin, Nathaniel L. Baker, et al.. (2010). Extinction of drug cue reactivity in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 48(9). 860–865. 21 indexed citations
7.
Tolliver, Bryan K., Aimee L. McRae‐Clark, Michael E. Saladin, et al.. (2010). Determinants of Cue-Elicited Craving and Physiologic Reactivity in Methamphetamine-Dependent Subjects in the Laboratory. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 36(2). 106–113. 48 indexed citations
8.
Spratt, Eve G., Sudie E. Back, Sharon D. Yeatts, et al.. (2009). Relationship between Child Abuse and Adult Smoking. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 39(4). 417–426. 37 indexed citations
9.
Waldrop, Angela E., Kimber L. Price, Stacia M. DeSantis, et al.. (2009). Community-dwelling cocaine-dependent men and women respond differently to social stressors versus cocaine cues. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 35(6). 798–806. 48 indexed citations
10.
Back, Sudie E., Karen J. Hartwell, Stacia M. DeSantis, et al.. (2009). Reactivity to laboratory stress provocation predicts relapse to cocaine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 106(1). 21–27. 126 indexed citations
11.
Price, Kimber L., Aimee L. McRae‐Clark, Michael E. Saladin, et al.. (2009). D-Cycloserine and Cocaine Cue Reactivity: Preliminary Findings. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 35(6). 434–438. 52 indexed citations
12.
Wiren, Kristine M., Joel G. Hashimoto, Paul E. Alele, et al.. (2006). Impact of Sex: Determination of Alcohol Neuroadaptation and Reinforcement. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 30(2). 233–242. 30 indexed citations
13.
Price, Kimber L. & Lawrence D. Middaugh. (2004). The Dopamine D1 Antagonist Reduces Ethanol Reward for C57BL/6 Mice. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 28(11). 1666–1675. 13 indexed citations
15.
Bimonte‐Nelson, Heather A., et al.. (2003). Ovarian Hormones and Cognition in the Aged Female Rat: I. Long-Term, but Not Short-Term, Ovariectomy Enhances Spatial Performance.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 117(6). 1395–1406. 75 indexed citations
16.
Szumlinski, Karen K., Kimber L. Price, Kelly Frys, & Lawrence D. Middaugh. (2002). Unconditioned and conditioned factors contribute to the ‘reinstatement’ of cocaine place conditioning following extinction in C57BL/6 mice. Behavioural Brain Research. 136(1). 151–160. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026