Lukas G. Becker
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes top 5%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Aerospace Engineering
- Co-authors
- Andreas DreizlerBenjamin BöhmJan KöserJ. JanickaReinhold KneerG. KuenneSteven WagnerMartin Schiemann
- Topics
- Combustion and flame dynamics (14 papers)Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (7 papers)Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Fluid Flow and Transfer ProcessesComputational MechanicsSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lukas G. Becker
15 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Computational Mechanics 364
- Biomedical Engineering 246
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 112
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 109
- Aerospace Engineering 67
Countries citing papers authored by Lukas G. Becker
This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas G. Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas G. Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas G. Becker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas G. Becker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas G. Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas G. Becker. The network helps show where Lukas G. Becker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lukas G. Becker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lukas G. Becker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lukas G. Becker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lukas G. Becker. Lukas G. Becker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 51 |
About Lukas G. Becker
Lukas G. Becker is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 16 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (14 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (7 papers) and Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (112 citations), Computational Mechanics (364 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (109 citations). Lukas G. Becker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Dreizler, Benjamin Böhm, Jan Köser, J. Janicka, Reinhold Kneer, G. Kuenne, Steven Wagner, Martin Schiemann, Viktor Scherer and Francesca di Mare. Their work appears in journals such as Fuel, Chemical Engineering Science and Combustion and Flame.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.