Daniel Thomas
Impact in
- Information Systems top 5%
- Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Spam and Phishing Detection
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Papers in
-
- Advanced Malware Detection Techniques 7
-
- Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies 9
- Co-authors
- Richard ClaytonAlice HutchingsAlastair R. BeresfordSergio PastranaBen CollierGeorge GeorgiouAndrew RiceFeng‐Bor Lin
- Journals
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering (1 paper)Policing & Society (1 paper)Big Data & Society (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)The British Journal of Criminology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChile
In The Last Decade
Daniel Thomas
20 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Information Systems 251
- Signal Processing 107
- Software 18
- Transportation 29
- Computer Networks and Communications 76
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Thomas. The network helps show where Daniel Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 81 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 17 | Chicago Downtown Freight Study | 2008 | 5 |
| 18 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 56 |
About Daniel Thomas
Daniel Thomas is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Building and Construction and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 22 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (9 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (7 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (3 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (2 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (2 papers) and Traffic control and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (251 citations), Signal Processing (107 citations), Software (18 citations), Transportation (29 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (76 citations). Daniel Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Richard Clayton, Alice Hutchings, Alastair R. Beresford, Sergio Pastrana, Ben Collier, George Georgiou, Andrew Rice, Feng‐Bor Lin, Thierry Daboval and Juan Tapiador. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Policing & Society, Big Data & Society, PLoS ONE and The British Journal of Criminology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.