Luis Oliveira
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Transportation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stewart BirrellChristopher BurnsRebecca CainVictoria MitchellAndrew MayPaul JenningsPeter J. ThomasChris Burns
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers)Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers)Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Luis Oliveira
19 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Social Psychology 156
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 81
- Automotive Engineering 80
- Human-Computer Interaction 62
- Transportation 54
Countries citing papers authored by Luis Oliveira
This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Oliveira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Oliveira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Oliveira more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Oliveira
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Oliveira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Oliveira. The network helps show where Luis Oliveira may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Oliveira
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Oliveira. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Oliveira based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Oliveira. Luis Oliveira is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | Phone-based presentation of other commuters’ subjective experiences: impact on car-driver intentions | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | UNDERSTANDING COOKING BEHAVIOURS TO DESIGN ENERGY SAVING INTERVENTIONS | 3 |
About Luis Oliveira
Luis Oliveira is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Marketing and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (62 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (81 citations) and Transportation (54 citations). Luis Oliveira has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stewart Birrell, Christopher Burns, Rebecca Cain, Victoria Mitchell, Andrew May, Paul Jennings, Peter J. Thomas, Chris Burns, Alexandros Mouzakitis and Mike Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, IEEE Access and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.