This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Gil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Gil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Gil more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Gil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Gil. The network helps show where Luis Gil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Gil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Gil.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Gil based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Gil. Luis Gil is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Valbuena‐Carabaña, María & Luis Gil. (2014). Efectos de la gestión selvícola pasada y presente sobre la diversidad genética actual y futura de Quercus pyrenaica Willd. en Sierra Nevada. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
7.
Valbuena‐Carabaña, María & Luis Gil. (2014). Assessing past and present management effects on current and future levels of genetic diversity in Quercus pyrenaica Willd. in Sierra Nevada.. Ecosistemas. 23(2). 90–98.2 indexed citations
8.
Perea, Ramón, Alfonso San Miguel, & Luis Gil. (2014). Interacciones planta-animal en la regeneración de Quercus pyrenaica: ecología y gestión. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(2). 18–26.1 indexed citations
9.
Gil, Luis, et al.. (2012). Biocompatible nanocomposite for PET/MRI hybrid imaging. Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group).8 indexed citations
10.
Heredia, Unai López de & Luis Gil. (2008). La diversidad en las especies forestales: un cambio de escala. El ejemplo del alcornoque. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
11.
Climent, José, Rosana López, Santiago González, & Luis Gil. (2007). El pino canario ( Pinus canariensis ), una especie singular. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 0.9 indexed citations
12.
Mutke, Sven, et al.. (2007). EL USO DEL PINO PIÑONERO COMO ESPECIE FRUTAL EN SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES DE SECANO. Cuadernos de la Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales. 137–142.2 indexed citations
13.
Climent, José, J. Alonso, & Luis Gil. (2005). Arquitectura del sistema radical en dos procedencias de Pinus canariensis.1 indexed citations
Gil, Luis, et al.. (2004). Evaluación de la calidad de plántulas de Pinus canariensis cultivadas con diferente métodos en la supervivencia y crecimiento en campo. Cuadernos de la Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales. 63–67.4 indexed citations
17.
Mutke, Sven & Luis Gil. (2004). Análisis y modelización de la arquitectura de copa de "Pinus pinae" L.. Cuadernos de la Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales. 71–76.3 indexed citations
18.
Tadesse, Wuletaw, et al.. (2001). Genetic improvement of resin yield from maritime pine in Spain. 10–16.4 indexed citations
19.
Jiménez, Pilar, Dolores Agúndez, Ricardo Alı́a, & Luis Gil. (1999). Genetic variation in central and marginal populations of Quercus suber L.. Silvae genetica. 48(6). 278–284.49 indexed citations
20.
Royo, A., Manuel Fernández, Luis Gil, & J. A. Pardos. (1997). Predicción de la supervivencia y crecimiento de las plantas de vivero mediante medidas de parámetros fisiológicos pre y post-trasplante. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 103–111.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.