Luigi Dattoli
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Marco Di NicolaLorenzo MocciaLuigi JaniriMaria PepeGabriele SaniAndrea FiorilloDelfina JaniriMarzia Molinaro
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPsychoneuroendocrinologyBrain Behavior and Immunity
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Luigi Dattoli
7 papers receiving 616 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Clinical Psychology 502
- Social Psychology 156
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 116
- Neurology 102
- General Health Professions 85
Countries citing papers authored by Luigi Dattoli
This map shows the geographic impact of Luigi Dattoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luigi Dattoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luigi Dattoli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luigi Dattoli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luigi Dattoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luigi Dattoli. The network helps show where Luigi Dattoli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luigi Dattoli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luigi Dattoli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luigi Dattoli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luigi Dattoli. Luigi Dattoli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | Affective temperament, attachment style, and the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak: an early report on the Italian general populationbreakdown → | 465 |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 42 |
About Luigi Dattoli
Luigi Dattoli is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (502 citations), Applied Psychology (84 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (116 citations). Luigi Dattoli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marco Di Nicola, Lorenzo Moccia, Luigi Janiri, Maria Pepe, Gabriele Sani, Andrea Fiorillo, Delfina Janiri, Marzia Molinaro, Daniela Chieffo and Isabella Panaccione. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychoneuroendocrinology and Brain Behavior and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.