Giacomo d’Andrea
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Giovanni MartinottiMauro PettorrusoAndrea MiuliStefania ChiappiniRoger S. McIntyreMassimo di GiannantonioStefano L. SensiFrancesco Di Carlo
- Topics
- Treatment of Major Depression (18 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (10 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMolecular Cell
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Giacomo d’Andrea
35 papers receiving 414 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Pharmacology 187
- Clinical Psychology 144
- Biological Psychiatry 112
- Psychiatry and Mental health 105
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 74
Countries citing papers authored by Giacomo d’Andrea
This map shows the geographic impact of Giacomo d’Andrea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giacomo d’Andrea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giacomo d’Andrea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giacomo d’Andrea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giacomo d’Andrea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giacomo d’Andrea. The network helps show where Giacomo d’Andrea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giacomo d’Andrea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giacomo d’Andrea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giacomo d’Andrea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giacomo d’Andrea. Giacomo d’Andrea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 59 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Giacomo d’Andrea
Giacomo d’Andrea is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (18 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (10 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (112 citations), Pharmacology (187 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations). Giacomo d’Andrea has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Martinotti, Mauro Pettorruso, Andrea Miuli, Stefania Chiappini, Roger S. McIntyre, Massimo di Giannantonio, Stefano L. Sensi, Francesco Di Carlo, Giorgio Di Lorenzo and Massimo Clerici. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Molecular Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.