Ludger Jansen

821 citations
58 papers · 355 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ludger Jansen

42 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Ludger Jansen
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Aging 32
  • History and Philosophy of Science 30
  • Artificial Intelligence 155
  • Molecular Biology 198
  • Philosophy 23
Replace Sune Holm with:
Sune Holm Denmark
Emmanuele Chersoni Hong Kong
Ben Kovitz United States
Sam Scott United States
Choh Man Teng United States
Atro Voutilainen Finland
Anil Kumar Gupta India
Gus Hahn-Powell United States
Roser Morante Belgium
Manoj Agarwal India
Ludger Jansen relative to Sune Holm Denmark Sune Holm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Sune Holm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ludger Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ludger Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludger Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludger Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ludger Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludger Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludger Jansen. The network helps show where Ludger Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ludger Jansen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ludger Jansen Line = papers co-authored together Ludger Jansen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201858
2 201345
3 201126
4 201425
5 200721
6 202021
7 200721
8 201414
9 201312
10 201111
11
Teaching Good Biomedical Ontology Design
201210
12 200910
13 20128
14 20136
15
The Ontology of Tendencies and Medical Information Sciences
20066
16 20175
17 20215
18 20165
19 20064
20
Identification of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who do not need immediate treatment.
20113

About Ludger Jansen

Ludger Jansen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (25 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (23 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (32 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), Artificial Intelligence (155 citations), Molecular Biology (198 citations) and Philosophy (23 citations). Ludger Jansen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include S Schulz, Stefan Schulz, Martin Boeker, Georg Fuellen, Andreas Simm, Rüdiger Köhling, Péter Antal, Walter Luyten, Brecht Wouters and Nadine Saul. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Semantics, Metaphysica, PLoS ONE, Rejuvenation Research and Topoi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact