Rejuvenation Research

1.2k papers and 28.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Rejuvenation Research in the last decades have received a total of 28.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Rejuvenation Research usually cover Physiology (409 papers), Molecular Biology (380 papers) and Aging (203 papers) specifically the topics of Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (203 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (77 papers) and Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rejuvenation Research are John J. Lemasters, Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey, Andrew R. Mendelsohn, James W. Larrick, Gustavo Barja, Benjamin Zealley, Dean P. Jones, Míkel Izquierdo, Leocadio Rodríguez‐Mañas and Eduardo Lusa Cadore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rejuvenation Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rejuvenation Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rejuvenation Research.

Countries where authors publish in Rejuvenation Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rejuvenation Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rejuvenation Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rejuvenation Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025