M. Gogol

546 citations
30 papers · 332 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M. Gogol

25 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

M. Gogol
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Aging 33
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 42
  • Cancer Research 64
  • Neurology 27
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
Replace Diego Marcos-Pérez with:
Diego Marcos-Pérez Spain
Long Feng China
Hirad Feridooni Canada
Jennifer A. Collister United Kingdom
Marco Scardapane Italy
Jason Moss United States
Anna FC Schut Netherlands
Ana Antunes Portugal
Lew Kuller United States
Weibing Wu China
M. Gogol relative to Diego Marcos-Pérez Spain Diego Marcos-Pérez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Diego Marcos-Pérez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Gogol

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Gogol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Gogol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Gogol more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Gogol

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Gogol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Gogol. The network helps show where M. Gogol may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Gogol, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Gogol Line = papers co-authored together M. Gogol links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201959
2 201858
3 201650
4 202142
5 202230
6 201827
7 201910
8 20148
9 20137
10 20167
11 20166
12 20145
13 20133
14 20083
15 20143
16
Are Age-Based Criteria the Best Way to Determine Eligibility for Prostate Cancer Screening? Authors' reply
20092
17 20112
18 20212
19 20071
20 20071

About M. Gogol

M. Gogol is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 30 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Health and Medical Studies (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (33 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (42 citations), Cancer Research (64 citations), Neurology (27 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations). M. Gogol has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Christian Krettek, Emmanouil Liodakis, Walter Maetzler, Eckart Meese, Andreas Simm, Christian Deuschle, Andreas Keller, Christina Backes, Marta Zampino and Rüdiger Köhling. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, GeroScience, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Annals of Internal Medicine and Aging and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact