Luca Pinto

678 total citations
36 papers, 351 citations indexed

About

Luca Pinto is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Luca Pinto has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 351 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Luca Pinto's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (21 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (12 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (9 papers). Luca Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (21 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (12 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (9 papers). Luca Pinto collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Ireland and Dominican Republic. Luca Pinto's co-authors include Manuela Moschella, Daniela Giannetti, Andrea Pedrazzani, Aldo Di Virgilio, Luigi Curini, Carolina Plescia, Pamela Pansardi, Gianfranco Baldini, Alessandro Pellegata and Paolo Segatti and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science and Journal of European Public Policy.

In The Last Decade

Luca Pinto

34 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luca Pinto Italy 10 259 105 99 47 39 36 351
Martin S. Edwards United States 9 132 0.5× 69 0.7× 72 0.7× 47 1.0× 63 1.6× 22 265
Myrto Tsakatika United Kingdom 8 390 1.5× 58 0.6× 122 1.2× 32 0.7× 25 0.6× 14 446
Daniela Campello Brazil 10 164 0.6× 63 0.6× 99 1.0× 64 1.4× 84 2.2× 19 304
Daniel Finke Denmark 14 423 1.6× 212 2.0× 58 0.6× 20 0.4× 58 1.5× 45 503
Sara Hagemann United Kingdom 11 426 1.6× 189 1.8× 50 0.5× 15 0.3× 36 0.9× 25 459
Jason L. Saving United States 7 160 0.6× 36 0.3× 44 0.4× 16 0.3× 147 3.8× 25 255
Wagner Pralon Mancuso Brazil 8 139 0.5× 51 0.5× 66 0.7× 6 0.1× 49 1.3× 30 214
Jean‐Dominique Lafay France 7 320 1.2× 73 0.7× 108 1.1× 16 0.3× 183 4.7× 19 391
Julia C. Morse United States 6 249 1.0× 104 1.0× 133 1.3× 32 0.7× 29 0.7× 12 399
Amy Catalinac United States 9 186 0.7× 44 0.4× 109 1.1× 8 0.2× 16 0.4× 17 241

Countries citing papers authored by Luca Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luca Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luca Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luca Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luca Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luca Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luca Pinto. The network helps show where Luca Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luca Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luca Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luca Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luca Pinto. Luca Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pansardi, Pamela & Luca Pinto. (2024). What makes political parties to elect more women? a cross-country comparison. Journal of Legislative Studies. 32(1). 143–157.
2.
Pinto, Luca. (2023). Anti-defection rules and party switching in the Italian Parliament. Party Politics. 31(1). 123–136. 4 indexed citations
3.
Moschella, Manuela & Luca Pinto. (2021). Themulti‐agenciesdilemma of delegation: Why do policymakers choose one or multiple agencies for financial regulation?. Regulation & Governance. 16(4). 1250–1264. 5 indexed citations
4.
Giannetti, Daniela, et al.. (2020). Populism and Policy Issues: Examining Political Communication on Twitter in Italy 2018-2019. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
5.
Giannetti, Daniela, Luca Pinto, & Carolina Plescia. (2020). The first Conte government: ‘government of change’ or business as usual?. Contemporary Italian Politics. 12(2). 182–199. 13 indexed citations
6.
Pansardi, Pamela & Luca Pinto. (2020). Gender penalty and electoral outcomes in the 2018 Italian elections. Contemporary Italian Politics. 12(3). 300–313. 5 indexed citations
7.
Pinto, Luca. (2020). The 2018 Italian general election: a ‘new Italy’ or a ‘dead end’?. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica. 50(2). 298–303. 3 indexed citations
8.
Moschella, Manuela, et al.. (2020). Let's speak more? How the ECB responds to public contestation. Journal of European Public Policy. 27(3). 400–418. 55 indexed citations
9.
Pedrazzani, Andrea & Luca Pinto. (2018). Italian candidates under the Rosato mixed electoral system. In search of personal votes in the plurality tier?. Journal of Modern Italian Studies. 23(4). 400–417. 4 indexed citations
10.
Pedrazzani, Andrea, Alessandro Pellegata, & Luca Pinto. (2018). Economic crisis and lawmaking. The impact of crisis on legislative agenda in Italy. Journal of Legislative Studies. 24(3). 315–337. 2 indexed citations
11.
Giannetti, Daniela, Andrea Pedrazzani, & Luca Pinto. (2018). The Rising Importance of Non-Economic Policy Dimensions and the Formation of the Conte Government in Italy. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 13(2). 27–44. 16 indexed citations
12.
Baldini, Gianfranco, Andrea Pedrazzani, & Luca Pinto. (2018). How Italy experienced (yet another) electoral system and why it may soon change it again. 3 indexed citations
13.
Giannetti, Daniela, Andrea Pedrazzani, & Luca Pinto. (2016). Party System Change in Italy: Politicising the EU and the Rise of Eccentric Parties. South European Society & Politics. 22(1). 21–42. 29 indexed citations
14.
Pedrazzani, Andrea & Luca Pinto. (2015). The Study of Political Candidates. Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano). 10(1). 23–29. 1 indexed citations
15.
Pinto, Luca. (2015). Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy. Acta Politica. 52(1). 43–63. 5 indexed citations
16.
Virgilio, Aldo Di, Daniela Giannetti, Andrea Pedrazzani, & Luca Pinto. (2014). Party Competition in the 2013 Italian Elections: Evidence from an Expert Survey. Government and Opposition. 50(1). 65–89. 31 indexed citations
17.
Pedrazzani, Andrea & Luca Pinto. (2013). The Work of Parliament in the Year of the Technocratic Government. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 28(1). 1 indexed citations
18.
Pinto, Luca, et al.. (2012). Il successo e i dilemmi del Movimento 5 stelle. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 61(4). 731–738. 8 indexed citations
19.
Virgilio, Aldo Di, Daniela Giannetti, & Luca Pinto. (2012). Patterns of party switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies 2008-2011. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica. 42(1). 29–57. 15 indexed citations
20.
Pinto, Luca, et al.. (1958). Economic Development, Social Change and Population Problems in Brazil. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 316(1). 121–126.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martin S. Edwards Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Myrto Tsakatika Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniela Campello Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Finke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sara Hagemann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason L. Saving Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wagner Pralon Mancuso Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean‐Dominique Lafay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julia C. Morse Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy Catalinac
Rankless by CCL
2026