Journal of Legislative Studies

885 papers and 9.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 885 papers published in Journal of Legislative Studies in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Legislative Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (701 papers), Strategy and Management (170 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (161 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (343 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (187 papers) and Political Systems and Governance (176 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Legislative Studies are Philip Norton, Tapio Raunio, Ulrich Sieberer, Louise Thompson, Kaare W. Strøm, Thomas Saalfeld, Federico Russo, Shane Martin, Reuven Y. Hazan and Nigel Jackson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Legislative Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Legislative Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Legislative Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Legislative Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Legislative Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Legislative Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Legislative Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025