Petra Schleiter
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Law top 2%
- Co-authors
- Edward Morgan‐JonesMargit TavitsCecilia Martínez‐GallardoPaul ChaistyLawrence EzrowTobias BöhmeltRoni LehrerSukriti Issar
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (24 papers)Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers)Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Petra Schleiter
40 papers receiving 523 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Political Science and International Relations 522
- Sociology and Political Science 190
- Economics and Econometrics 117
- Strategy and Management 115
- Law 84
Countries citing papers authored by Petra Schleiter
This map shows the geographic impact of Petra Schleiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petra Schleiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petra Schleiter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Petra Schleiter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petra Schleiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petra Schleiter. The network helps show where Petra Schleiter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Petra Schleiter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Petra Schleiter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Petra Schleiter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Petra Schleiter. Petra Schleiter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | Government Accountability and the Survival of Semi-Presidential Democracies | 0 |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | Citizens, Presidents, and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz | 12 |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | Semipresidencialismo: decisiones constitucionales y consecuencias políticas | 0 |
| 19 | The Eastern Enlargement of the EU and the Semi-Presidential Revolution | 0 |
| 20 | 14 |
About Petra Schleiter
Petra Schleiter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (24 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (522 citations), Law (84 citations) and Strategy and Management (115 citations). Petra Schleiter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Edward Morgan‐Jones, Margit Tavits, Cecilia Martínez‐Gallardo, Paul Chaisty, Lawrence Ezrow, Tobias Böhmelt, Roni Lehrer, Sukriti Issar, Hugh Ward and Jonathan Homola. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Political Science Review and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.