Marek Nalos
Impact in
-
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
-
- Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Papers in
-
- Ultrasound in Clinical Applications 8
-
- Renal function and acid-base balance 6
- Co-authors
- Anthony S. McLeanStephen HuangSean M. BagshawAnthony DelaneyBenjamin TangDavid R. BoothGrant P. ParnellSheng‐Tung Huang
In The Last Decade
Marek Nalos
61 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 282
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 259
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 404
- Emergency Medicine 162
- Epidemiology 536
Countries citing papers authored by Marek Nalos
This map shows the geographic impact of Marek Nalos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marek Nalos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marek Nalos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marek Nalos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marek Nalos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marek Nalos. The network helps show where Marek Nalos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marek Nalos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 16 | Bedside lung ultrasound, mobile radiography and physical examination: a comparative analysis of diagnostic tools in the critically ill. | 2016 | 25 |
| 17 | 2011 | 52 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 92 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 313 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 10 |
About Marek Nalos
Marek Nalos is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Nephrology, Emergency Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (17 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (17 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (11 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (8 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (8 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (7 papers) and Renal function and acid-base balance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (282 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (259 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (404 citations), Emergency Medicine (162 citations) and Epidemiology (536 citations). Marek Nalos has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anthony S. McLean, Stephen Huang, Sean M. Bagshaw, Anthony Delaney, Benjamin Tang, David R. Booth, Grant P. Parnell, Sheng‐Tung Huang, Ian Seppelt and Donald Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Shock.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.