Louis de Branges

3.3k citations
77 papers · 1.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 20
Topics
Holomorphic and Operator Theory (27 papers)Meromorphic and Entire Functions (21 papers)Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (15 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Louis de Branges

68 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture19852026199820121985100200300400500

Peers

Louis de Branges
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Applied Mathematics 1.4k
  • Mathematical Physics 760
  • Geometry and Topology 666
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 363
  • Algebra and Number Theory 196
Replace W. K. Hayman with:
W. K. Hayman United Kingdom
F. W. Gehring United States
Olli Lehto Finland
John Wermer United States
M. K. Vamanamurthy New Zealand
Олли Мартио Finland
Max Koecher Germany
Marvin Rosenblum United States
R. G. Douglas United States
Leo Sario United States
Louis de Branges relative to W. K. Hayman United Kingdom W. K. Hayman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. K. Hayman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Louis de Branges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louis de Branges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis de Branges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis de Branges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louis de Branges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis de Branges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis de Branges. The network helps show where Louis de Branges may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis de Branges

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis de Branges. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis de Branges based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis de Branges. Louis de Branges is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 13
2 4
3
Underlying concepts in the proof of the Bieberbach conjecture
9
4 2
5 4
6 1
7 2
8 3
9 0
10 14
11 2
12 13
13 1
14
Hilbert spaces of entire functions
256
15 12
16 20
17 15
18 8
19 7
20 63

About Louis de Branges

Louis de Branges is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Holomorphic and Operator Theory (27 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (21 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (1.4k citations), Mathematical Physics (760 citations) and Geometry and Topology (666 citations). Louis de Branges has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Rovnyak, Israel Gohberg and Richard Bolstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Advances in Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026