Louis Bherer
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Sylvie BellevilleP. LemaireStanley J. ColcombeKirk I. EricksonMatthew S. PetersonPaige E. ScalfArthur F. KramerIsabelle Peretz
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers)Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Louis Bherer
17 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Cognitive Neuroscience 111
- Neurology 108
- Psychiatry and Mental health 87
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 40
- Clinical Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Louis Bherer
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis Bherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis Bherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis Bherer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis Bherer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis Bherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis Bherer. The network helps show where Louis Bherer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis Bherer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis Bherer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis Bherer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis Bherer. Louis Bherer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 56 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | The effect of virtual reality rehabilitation on the gait parameters of older women with mixed urinary incontinence: a feasibility study | 1 |
| 17 | Impaired executive function is associated with mixed urinary incontinence in older, community-dwelling women. | 3 |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Louis Bherer
Louis Bherer is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (40 citations), Neurology (108 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations). Louis Bherer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Sylvie Belleville, P. Lemaire, Stanley J. Colcombe, Kirk I. Erickson, Matthew S. Peterson, Paige E. Scalf, Arthur F. Kramer, Isabelle Peretz, Geneviève Albouy and Ovidiu Lungu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.