Matthew S. Peterson
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Arthur F. KramerStanley J. ColcombeKirk I. EricksonLouis BhererDavid E. IrwinJason S. McCarleyEnsar BecicMelissa R. Beck
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (41 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers)Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matthew S. Peterson
63 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 564
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 272
- Psychiatry and Mental health 250
- Social Psychology 243
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew S. Peterson
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew S. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew S. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew S. Peterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew S. Peterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew S. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew S. Peterson. The network helps show where Matthew S. Peterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew S. Peterson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew S. Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew S. Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew S. Peterson. Matthew S. Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 195 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 98 | |
| 10 | 221 | |
| 11 | 174 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 142 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Matthew S. Peterson
Matthew S. Peterson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (41 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (564 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (192 citations). Matthew S. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arthur F. Kramer, Stanley J. Colcombe, Kirk I. Erickson, Louis Bherer, David E. Irwin, Jason S. McCarley, Ensar Becic, Melissa R. Beck, Paige E. Scalf and Ranxiao Frances Wang. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Journal of Neurophysiology and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.